NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/3967/2009

GURVINDER SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

IN PERSON

07 Jan 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3967 OF 2009
(Against the Order dated 25/08/2009 in Appeal No. 235/2009 of the State Commission Punjab)
1. GURVINDER SINGHS/o Sh. Gurdev Singh, VPO Mehma Sarja, Dist. Bathinda - 151 201PUNJAB ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS & ORS.IGNOU, (Maidan Garhi)NEW DELHI - 110 0682. THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR,S.S.C. IGNOU, (Maidan Garhi)NEW DELHI - 110 068 ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Petitioner :IN PERSON
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 07 Jan 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard the Petitioner who appears in person. There is no averment at all in the revision memo relating to order of the State Commission dated 25.8.2009. The State Commission had dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation on the ground that the app/Complainant had not filed certified copy of District Forum’s order as also not filed application for condonation of delay. Besides this, the appellant was not present on the date of hearing before the District Forum. The State Commission had accordingly dismissed the appeal. In the revision memo, there is no averment with reference to the said order of the State Commission. The revision is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.


......................JR.K. BATTAPRESIDING MEMBER