Chairman, Dabur India Ltd., and another V/S P.V.Shivaprakash and 5 others - Consumer Court Case

Karnataka

Mysore

CPA/1994/82

P.V.Shivaprakash and 5 others - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chairman, Dabur India Ltd., and another - Opp.Party(s)

05 Aug 1997

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM MYSORE
No.1542/F, Anikethana Road, C and D Block, J.C.S.T. Layout, Kuvempunagara, (Behind Jagadamba Petrol Bunk), Mysore-570009.
consumer case(CC) No. CPA/1994/82

P.V.Shivaprakash and 5 others Annapurneshwari S. Lalithambike, Shamalambike Ramakrishna S. Swathi S.						...........Appellant(s)
Vs.
Chairman, Dabur India Ltd., and another MAS Services Pvt. Ltd.,						...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):

OppositeParty/Respondent(s):

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended

Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

ORDER

The complainant is not present. On the last date, he was directed to produce any case law to show that this Forum has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint. In view of the decision 1994(111) CPR page 483 that may be noted that the grievance of the complainant is with regard to non-issue of shares for which he had applied, and such a dispute will not amount to any deficiency of service and will not fall within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act. Reference may be made to 1994(111) CPR page 483. In view of the above discussion the complaint is not maintainable as the question of deficiency of service is not involved and is liable to be dismissed. The complaint stands dismissed and no costs.

The complainant is not present. On the last date, he was directed to produce any case law to show that this Forum has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint. In view of the decision 1994(111) CPR page 483 that may be noted that the grievance of the complainant is with regard to non-issue of shares for which he had applied, and such a dispute will not amount to any deficiency of service and will not fall within the purview of the Consumer Protection Act. Reference may be made to 1994(111) CPR page 483.<br /> In view of the above discussion the complaint is not maintainable as the question of deficiency of service is not involved and is liable to be dismissed.<br /> The complaint stands dismissed and no costs.