Karnataka

Bangalore 4th Additional

CC/11/2335

Mr. Ram Singh (Aged about 26 Years) S/o. Mr. Ramasevak - Complainant(s)

Versus

Chairman Acharaya Institutues - Opp.Party(s)

Sri. Syed Ishrathulla Hussaini

06 Feb 2012

ORDER

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBAN
No.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052
 
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2335
 
1. Mr. Ram Singh (Aged about 26 Years) S/o. Mr. Ramasevak
Village Pure Kali, Post Belahani District Raebareli (Up) -229203 Represented by Mr Syed Ishrathulla Hussaini -Agent
Raebareli
Uttarpradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Chairman Acharaya Institutues
Soldevananhalli, Hesaraghatta Main Road, Bangalore -560090
Bangalore
Karnataka
2. 2. Chairman Aristotle College Of Pharmacy
Andersonpet, Kolar Gold Field -563113 Kolar District
Kolar
Karnataka
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE J.N.Havanur PRESIDENT
 HONORABLE Ganganarsaiah Member
 HONORABLE Anita Shivakumar. K Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

SRI.J.N.HAVANUR, PRESIDENT

 

        This is a complaint filed by the complainant under section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, praying to pass an order, directing the Ops to pay a compensation of Rs.18,00,000=00 for loss of six years career and cost.

 

We have heard the arguments of the complainant at the stage of admission; we have gone through the averments of the complaint and relevant documents. On perusal of the complaint, it is made clear that, in the complaint, the complainant has not stated the exact date on which cause of action arose to file the present complaint. The entire complaint is ominous silent, on this material aspect, so also in the complaint, no where it is mentioned for having made correspondence with the OP. In the documents produced on behalf of the complainant, we do not find the copy of the notice issued to the OP. Unless and until¸ the complainant makes correspondence with the OP by writing a letter, he does not get any right to file the present complaint. The complainant is directed to file a fresh complaint, after making correspondence with the Ops. In the result, we proceed to pass the following:

 

ORDER

 

          The complainant is permitted to withdraw the complaint with liberty to file a fresh complaint after making correspondence with the Ops.

    

Dictated to the Stenographer, Got it transcribed and corrected, Pronounced on the Open Forum on this 6th February 2012.

       

                                        

         Member                   Member                    President

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE J.N.Havanur]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONORABLE Ganganarsaiah]
Member
 
[HONORABLE Anita Shivakumar. K]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.