Purnima Pradhan. filed a consumer case on 04 Feb 2020 against Center Head, Bikash IAS Academy. in the Khordha Consumer Court. The case no is CC/149/2019 and the judgment uploaded on 24 Feb 2020.
BEFORE THE DIST.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KHURDA, BHUBANESWAR:
-ooOoo-
C.D.CASE NO. 149/ 2019
Purnima Pradhan, aged about 22 years,
D/o Hrudaya Ballabha Pradhan,
At – Flat No.D/118, Basant Park Apartment,
Forest Park area, Bhubaneswar – 751009
Dist – Khurda, Mob No.7978114106
…. Complainant
-Vrs.-
Centre Head, Bikash IAS Academy, near DAV School of
Business Management, Unit – 8, Bhubaneswar – 751012
… Opp.Party
For the complainant … In person
For the O.P. … Sri U.Ch.Sethi & Associates
Date of filing : 16/04/2019
Date of disposal : 04/02/2020
ORDER
MR.B.R.SWAIN, MEMBER :
1. The brief fact of the case is that, the complainant took admission in the OP coaching Institute i.e. Bikash IAS Academy, Bhubaneswar and made payment of the course fee in three phases amounting to Rs.35,000/- total for IAS coaching classes commencing from 07/11/2018. But after attending only eight (8) classes, she found the quality of teaching to be substandard and very dissatisfied. Most of the information provided at the time of admission were latter proved to be false. So following frustration and depression she stopped going classes from 29/11/2018. Thereafter the complainant claimed refund of an amount of Rs.30,000/- from the OP which she had given for six months course. But the OP refused to refund the same on the ground that “No Application for refund of fees is accepted” as cited in the application form and also in the money receipt provided to the complainant during the time of admission. Several attempts were made through phone calls and applications were sent for refund of money, but no clear reply was given by the OP. So on being aggrieved, alleging deficiency in service and unfair trade practice on the part of the OP, the case has been filed by the complainant U/s 12 of the C.P.Act, 1096 with prayer to direct the OP to refund the amount of Rs.30,000/- to the complainant along with Rs.10,000/- a compensation for mental agony and harassment.
2. Upon notice, the OP put in appearance and filed its written version denying the allegation of the complainant as averred in the complaint petition that due to frustration and depression the complainant stopped going to classes. It is stated that the amount of Rs.35,000/- deposited by the complainant is towards the admission fees for coaching classes of IAS preliminary G.S. for 3 months and the complainant attended the classes for the above period, hence refund of Rs.30,000/- does not arise at all. It is also contended that the money receipt attached in the complaint petition were clearly mentioned that “no application for refund of fees is accepted” and the same is with the knowledge of the complainant, then there is no scope for the complainant to seek for refund of Rs.30,000/- and as such the complainant is not entitled to any amount as claimed in her complaint petition and the complaint is liable to be dismissed.
3. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the arguments advanced before us by both sides during the course of hearing and have examined the materials on record. It appears from the record that the complainant has furnished the copies of the money receipts issued by Bikash IAS Academy against the money deposited by the complainant towards the admission fees for Preliminary G.S. (UPSC & OPSC). Admittedly, the complainant after depositing the 1st phase of money on dated 07/11/2018, has attended the coaching classes, which was started from that very date. Thereafter, she has deposited the further amount of fees in two phases and the last payment was made on 28/11/2018. So the plea taken by the complainant that the quality of teaching was substandard and very dissatisfied and following frustration and depression, she stopped going classes from 29/11/2018, is hard to believe. Because if the complainant was not satisfied with the quality of teaching, then she would not have deposited the fees on 28/11/2018 and if at all after depositing the fees, stopped going to classes from 29/11/2018, then she could have been approached the OP for refund of money immediately after that. But on verification, we do not find any such documents available on record, except a copy of an application for refund of money sent by mother of the complainant to the OP on dated 13/03/2019 which is after more than three months from the alleged discontinuance of classes by the complainant as claimed. From this, we have no hesitation to believe that the complainant has actually attended the classes for three months as claimed by the OP. Also, the money receipts itself reveals that “No application for refund of fees is accepted” and by knowing fully well about this the complainant deposited the 2nd and 3rd installments of the admission fees.
So from the above circumstances, we do not find any reason to hold that the OPs committed any deficiency in service or unfair trade practice so as to entitle the complainant to any refund of money claimed by her in the complaint petition. Hence considering the above fact, it is ordered that:-
ORDER
The complaint is dismissed on contest against the OP without cost.
The order is pronounced on this day the 4th February, 2020 under the seal & signature of the President and Members of the Forum.
MEMBER
Dictated & corrected by me
Member
I agree I agree
Member (W) President
(MISS K.NAYAK) (P.C.MISHRA)
Transcribed by Smt.M.Kanungo, Sr.Steno :
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.