Delhi

StateCommission

CC/414/2014

MS. ASHA PURI & ANR. - Complainant(s)

Versus

CDR. D.S. DAHIYA (RETD.) & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

22 Sep 2014

ORDER

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHI
Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986
 
Complaint Case No. CC/414/2014
 
1. MS. ASHA PURI & ANR.
A-43 AYUDH VIHAR SEC-13, PLOT NO-3 DWARKA, N.D.-110075.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. CDR. D.S. DAHIYA (RETD.) & ANR.
REGD. OFFICE: D-16/C BHAGWANI HOUSE HAUZ KHAS N.D.-110016.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor MEMBER
 HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 

Date of Decision:  22-09-2014

Complaint Case No. 414/14.

 

Mrs. Asha Puri

A-43, Ayudh Vihar

Sector-13, Plot No. 3,

Dwarka, N.Delhi-110075

……Complainant No. 1

Lt. Gen. Rakesh Puri (Retd.)

A-43, Ayudh Vihar

Sector-13, Plot No. 3,

Dwarka, N.Delhi-110075

……Complainant No. 2

 

 

Versus

CDR. D.S. Dahiya (Retd.)

Chairman

Vigneshwaqqra Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Regd. Office; D-16/C Bhagwani House

Hauz Khas

N.Delhi-110016

 

…Opposite Party No. 1

Sh. Sunil Kumar Dahiya

Director

Vigneshwaqqra Developers Pvt. Ltd.

Regd. Office; D-16/C Bhagwani House

Hauz Khas

N.Delhi-110016

 

…Opposite Party No. 2

 

CORAM

Justice Veena Birbal, President

Salma Noor, Member

N P Kaushik Member (Judicial)

1.            Whether reporters of local newspaper be allowed to see the judgment?

2.            To be referred to the reporter or not?

 

 

N P Kaushik Member (Judicial)

  1. Heard the complaint on admission. 
  2. The case of the complainant is that he paid an amount of Rs.20 lacs (approx.) to the OP for allotment of an area of 500 Sq. ft. of a commercial space.  The OP had agreed to pay an assured return every month @Rs.65/- per Sq. ft. For the aforesaid area for a period of 60 months.  In the event of delay, the OP agreed to pay back the entire amount @Rs.6500/- per Sq. Ft.  The OP made regular payments for a period of 5 years. Be that as it may, the admitted case of the complainant is that the space in question was a commercial one.  An amount of Rs.20 lacs (approx.) was paid for an assured return @ Rs.65/- per Sq. ft. per month. 
  3. The transaction in question was purely commercial in nature.  The present complaint hence is not maintainable in terms of Section 2 (d) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 which is reproduced below:-

(d)                   “Consumer” means any person who, -

(i)           ..........

(ii)          (hires or avails of) any services for a consideration which has been paid or promised or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment and includes any beneficiary of such services other than the person who (hires or avails of ) the services for consideration paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or under any system of deferred payment, when such services are availed of with the approval of the first mentioned person (but does not include a person who avails of such services for any commercial purpose);

              (Explanation- For the purposes of this clause, “commercial purpose” does not include use by a person of goods bought and used by him and services availed by him exclusively for the purposes of earning his livelihood by means of self-employment;)

 

  1. It is not the case of the complaint that he wanted to run his own business for earning his livelihood
  2. The complaint is hence dismissed.

    

       

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE VEENA BIRBAL]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Salma Noor]
MEMBER
 
[HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE N.P KAUSHIK]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.