Maharashtra

Additional DCF, Nagpur

RBT/CC/380/2018

SHRI. SURESH MURLIDHAR UMREDKAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

CAPITOL HEIGHTS (TATA REALITY INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.) T.R.I.F. REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT LTD., THROUG - Opp.Party(s)

ADV. A. T. SAWAL

24 May 2024

ORDER

ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
NAGPUR
New Administrative Building No.-1
3rd Floor, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440001
Ph.0712-2546884
 
Complaint Case No. RBT/CC/380/2018
 
1. SHRI. SURESH MURLIDHAR UMREDKAR
R/O. FLAT NO. 302, NAVNATH APARTMENT, CHITNISPURA, ZENDA CHOWK, MAHAL, NAGPUR
Nagpur
Maharashtra
2. SOU. PRIYA SURESH UMREDKAR
R/O. FLAT NO. 302, NAVNATH APARTMENT, CHITNISPURA, ZENDA CHOWK, MAHAL, NAGPUR
Nagpur
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. CAPITOL HEIGHTS (TATA REALITY INFRASTRUCTURE LTD.) T.R.I.F. REAL ESTATE AND DEVELOPMENT LTD., THROUGH DINESH BADMERA & RUCHIKA LUHA
OFF. AT, CAPITOL HEIGHTS, NEAR MEDICAL CHOWK, RAMBAG, NAGPUR-440003 / REG. OFF. AT, 2ND FLOOR, ARMI NEVHI BUILDING, 148, M.G.ROAD, MUMBAI-400001
MUMBAI
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SATISH A. SAPRE PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. SMITA N. CHANDEKAR MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 24 May 2024
Final Order / Judgement

As per Mr. Satish Sapre,  Hon’ble President.

In present case OP moved application for dismissal of complaint on 17/07/2018, on the ground of pecuniary jurisdiction, which was after hearing the parties was rejected by this commission on dt.29/07/2019.

 

Being aggrieved by this order OP preferred Revision Petition bearing No. RP/19/53 before Hon’ble State Commission, Circuit Bench at Nagpur, which was allowed by Hon’ble State Commission on 25/02/2022 and set aside order passed by this commission dtd.29/07/2019. Furthermore, Hon’ble State Commission directed complaint be returned to the complainant for being presented to appropriated forum/Commission for being tried in accordance with law.

 

In view of the above factual background and order of Hon’ble State Commission dtd.25/02/2022, as this commission has not pecuniary jurisdiction. Hence, present complaint is returned to complainant for being presented to appropriate commission.

 

Accordingly case is disposed of as returned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SATISH A. SAPRE]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. SMITA N. CHANDEKAR]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.