Ekta Ahuja filed a consumer case on 08 Mar 2017 against Capital First in the West Delhi Consumer Court. The case no is CC/14/622 and the judgment uploaded on 09 Mar 2017.
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI
150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, JanakPuri, New Delhi – 110058
Date of institution: 19.09.2014
Complaint Case. No.622 /14 Date of order: 08.03.2017
IN MATTER OF
Ekta Ahuja, S-4/118, St. no.8, Old Mahavir Nagar, New Delhi-110018 Complainant
VERSUS
Capital First, A-14, 1st Floor, Milap Nagar, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-110059 Opposite party
ORDER
R.S. BAGRI,PRESIDENT
Briefly case of the complainant is that on 26.06.13 she took loan of Rs.1,65,000/- from the opposite party against gold on interest @15% per annum. The complainant on 13.05.14 with her father-in-law Shri J.K. Ahuja visited the opposite party for calculation of interest as she wanted to repay the loan with interest in June, 2014. He on 20.05.14 visited the opposite party. Who told that penalty of Rs.17,000/- had to be paid by the complainant. The penalty charges @85% per mansum are unjustified. She objected. The employees of the opposite party told the complainant that only a sum of Rs.50/100 of penalty will be charged if interest is not paid. The complainant took up the matter with Mediation and Conciliation Centre of Delhi Govt, Parliament Street New Delhi. But to no effect. Hence, the present complaint for directions to the opposite party to settle his case of loan.
Notice of the complaint was sent to the opposite party. But despite service none appeared on behalf of the opposite party. The opposite party was proceeded exparte vide order dated 03.02.15.
When the complainant was asked to lead evidence by way of affidavit, she filed her affidavit narrating facts of the complaint. The complainant in support of her case also relied upon letter dated 14.11.14 sent by the opposite party to the complainant, copy of reference no.459/PS/DIR/2014 dated 12.09.14 from Delhi Govt, Mediation and Conciliation Centre. Copy of gold pledge card and receipt of disbursement of loan.
We have heard A/R and father-in-law of the complainant and have gone through the record carefully and thoroughly. The only prayer of the complainant is for direction to the opposite party to settle her case. The complainant has taken loan from the opposite party against gold. The claim of the opposite party has remained unsettled. Therefore, the opposite party is directed to settle loan case of the complainant within 30 days from receipt of copy of this order.
Order pronounced on : 08.03.2017
(PUNEET LAMBA) (URMILA GUPTA) ( R.S. BAGRI )
MEMBER MEMBER PRESIDENT
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.