Delhi

South Delhi

CC/428/2014

SATISH SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

CANARA BANK - Opp.Party(s)

29 Jul 2017

ORDER

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM -II UDYOG SADAN C C 22 23
QUTUB INSTITUTIONNAL AREA BEHIND QUTUB HOTEL NEW DELHI 110016
 
Complaint Case No. CC/428/2014
 
1. SATISH SINGH
HO NO 124 FETAHPUR BERI NEW DELHI 110074
SOUTH DELHI
NEW DELHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. CANARA BANK
FETAHPUR BERI KH HO 229/2
SOUTH DELHI
NEW DELHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  N K GOEL PRESIDENT
  NAINA BAKSHI MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
none
 
For the Opp. Party:
none
 
Dated : 29 Jul 2017
Final Order / Judgement

                                                     DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II

Udyog Sadan, C-22 & 23, Qutub Institutional Area

(Behind Qutub Hotel), New Delhi-110016

 

Case No.428/2014

Sh. Satish Singh

S/o Sh. Natar Pal Singh

R/o H.No. 124, Fatehpur Beri,

New Delhi-110074                                                       ….Complainant

 

Versus

Branch Manager,

Canara Bank,

Fatehpur, Kh. No. 229/2,

New Delh-                                                                  ….Opposite Party

  

                                                          Date of Institution: 14.11.14     Date of Order          :  29.07.17

Coram:

Sh. N.K. Goel, President

Ms. Naina Bakshi, Member

 

ORDER

 

          Complaint reads as under:-

 

“Subject:-   my saving Account No.0963010009889 ATM used in  Canara Bank, Fathepur, New Delhi for drawing Rs 8,500/- on 9-9-2014

Sir,  

with reference to the subject cited above and to say that I have used the ATM in CANARA BANK for withdrawing the Rs 8,500/- on 9-9-2014 but the ATM Machine did not come in function and my Rs 8,500/- and not been withdrawn from the ATM Machine,

The Manager of Canara Bank, has told that we are not responsible for lossing the Rs.8,500/- in ATM Machine, You consult to your bank, and the amount has been deducted from my said Accounts but not received by me through ATM.

Kindly consider my case and Rs.8,500/-  may be given to me.”

OPs are exparte. Later on Bank of Baroda has been impleaded as OP No.2.  Notice was issued to the OP No.1 & 2. The same were delivered to the OP No.1 & 2 as per track reports Mark A and Mark B which were served upon them on 15.05.15 and 08.05.15 respectively for 27.07.17.  OP No.1 & 2 were proceeded exparte on 19.08.15.

The complainant has filed a very brief affidavit in evidence.

the complainant has not stated any detail regarding withdrawal of the amount from his ATM card. He has not filed any document regarding this fact. Hence, the complaint is vague and not specific.

In view of the above discussion, we do not find any merit in the complaint and dismiss it with no order as to costs.

Let a copy of this order be sent to the parties as per regulation 21 of the Consumer Protection Regulations.  Thereafter file be consigned to record room.

 

Announced on 29.07.17.

 
 
[ N K GOEL]
PRESIDENT
 
[ NAINA BAKSHI]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.