This Revision Petition by the Complainant, under Section 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, calls in question the correctness of

-2-

order dated 27.03.2014 passed by the Himachal Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Shimla (for short “the State Commission”) in First Appeal No.244/2012.  By the impugned order, the State Commission has modified order dated 05.06.2012 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Mandi (for short “the District Forum”) in Compliant No.280/2010, to the extent of reducing the amount of compensation awarded by the District Forum, for alleged deficiency in service on the part of the Respondent Bank in wrongly crediting a sum of `20,000/-, deposited by the Complainant on 22.11.2006, in his another account instead of in the loan account towards the monthly installment for the months of May, June, July and August 2010 from `25,000/- to `5,000/-.

              We have heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner.              

              The grievance of the Petitioner is that having affirmed the finding of the District Forum to the effect that there was no deficiency in service on the part of the Respondent Bank on account of the said lapse, the State Commission has erred in reducing the amount of compensation.

              We have carefully perused the impugned order.  We find that the decision of the State Commission is supported by cogent reasons and therefore, the impugned order does not suffer from such material irregularity so as to warrant interference by this Commission in exercise of revisional jurisdiction.  The Revision Petition is dismissed accordingly.