Kerala

StateCommission

RP/11/14

P.N.SASI - Complainant(s)

Versus

C.V.THAMPI - Opp.Party(s)

C.S.RAJMOHAN

22 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
Revision Petition No. RP/11/14
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/10/2010 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/09/20 of District Idukki)
 
1. P.N.SASI
POOVATHERIKAL HOUSE,KALLARKUTTY.P.O
IDUKKI
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. C.V.THAMPI
CHERUPARAMBIL HOUSE,MACHPLAVU
IDUKKI
KERALA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
  SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR Member
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

REVISION PETITION:14/2011

 

                          JUDGMENT DATED:22-03-2011

 

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU              :  PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                             : MEMBER

 

1.      P.N. Sasi, Poovatherikal House,

Kallarkutty.P.O, Kallarkutty.

Idukki District.

 

2.      P.N. Venu, -do-   -do-

 

3.      Maheswaran.M.S,                            : REVISION PETITIONERS

Moozhikal Veedu, Mukkundom.P.O.

 

4.      E.K.Sasi, Elavumkudi Veedu,

Kallarkutty.p.O.

 

5.      Thomas, Choolikkara Veedu,

Naykunnukara, Kumbanpara.P.O.

 

(By Adv.Sri.C.S.Rajmohan)

 

          Vs.

1.      C.V. Thampi,

Cheruparambil House,

Machiplav.P.O, Machiplavu,

Idukki Dist.

(Secretary, Vyapari Vyavasai Samithi,

Adimali Unit)                                              : RESPONDENTS

 

 

2.      T.K.Shaji, Thoppil House,

Anaviratti.P.O, Anaviratti, Idukki.

(President, Vyapari Vyavasai Samithi,

Adimali Unit)

 

3.      Mohanan, Kanakkancheyil House,

Mukkundam.P.O, Idukki Dist.

(Daily Collection Agent, Vyapari Vyavasai Samithi,

Adimali Unit)

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

Revision petitioner is one of the complainants in CC.20/09 in the file of CDRF, Idukki.  The complaint filed by the Revision Petitioner and 4 others stand dismissed.  There was delay of 288 days in filing the restoration petition before the Forum.  The Forum has dismissed the application on the ground that the delay stands not explained properly.

2.      It is the case of the Revision petitioner that he was laid up due to hyper tension.  The Forum has observed that even if the petitioner was laid up the other complainants could have represented the matter before the Forum.

3.      In view of the fact that the grievance of the complainants stands not examined we find that it would be appropriate to set aside the order of the Forum on payment of cost of Rs.500/- to each opposite parties ie Rs.1500/- in total.  On payment of cost the Forum will take the matter back to file and dispose of the same on merits.  The Forum will issue notice to the opposite parties.  The matter stands posted before the Forum on 6/5/2011.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

 

VL.

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT
 
[ SRI.S.CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.