Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/09/71

Haridas.K. - Complainant(s)

Versus

C.v.Krishnan - Opp.Party(s)

V.Gopi

24 Sep 2009

ORDER


IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD
OLD S.P. OFFICE, PULIKUNNU
consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/71

Haridas.K.
...........Appellant(s)

Vs.

C.v.Krishnan
...........Respondent(s)


BEFORE:
1. K.T.Sidhiq 2. P.P.Shymaladevi 3. P.Ramadevi

Complainant(s)/Appellant(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):


OppositeParty/Respondent(s):




ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

D.o.F: 13/03/09

D.o.O:24/9/09

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                                CC.71/09

                        Dated this, the 24th  day of September 2009.

PRESENT

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ                                            : PRESIDENT

SMT.P.RAMADEVI                                                : MEMBER

SMT.P.P.SYAMALADEVI                         : MEMBER

 

 

Haridas.K,

S/o Balakrishnan Nair,

R/at Rachiyam Veedu,                                          : Complainant

Padinhattam  Kozhuval ,Po.Nileshwar.

(Adv.T.V.Vijayan,Hosdurg)

 

 

1. C.V.Krishnan, S/o.Koman,                       

     R/at Vainingat, Uppilikkai.Po, Nileshwar..

(Adv.E.Sukumaran,Hosdurg)

2. V.Balachandran, S/o.Krishnan,

    Haripuram, Pullur.Po, Hosdurg Taluk                  : Opposite parties

(Exparte)

 3. Rajani.K,  W/o Venugopal,

    Pigmi Collection Agent,

   R/at Kuttiyathor House,Po.Uppilakkai,

(Adv.Ramya.K.V,Kasaragod)   

 

 

 

                                                                                   ORDER

SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ: PRESIDENT

    Tersely stated, the grievance of the complainant is that he joined in the chitty conducted by opposite parties  on 6/1/06.  The total chitty amount on maturity to be received was Rs.1,05,000/-.  The monthly subscription payable was Rs.5000/-.  Complainant paid 14 monthly chitty installments amounting to Rs.70,000/-.   On enquiry made by the complainant    it revealed that opposite parties 1&2 are collected huge amount from various chittalans and after misappropriating the amount closed the chitty offices and   were absconded.  Hence the complaint  alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.

2.     Notice to all opposite parties  were issued.  Notice to Opposite party No.2 was  returned with endorsement left.  Hence publication of notice against opposite party No.2 was ordered and even after publication of notice opposite party  2 remained absent and  set exparte.     The counsels  for   opposite  paries No.1&3 represented and filed version . Opposite party No.1 and opposite party No.3,  the agent of Ist opposite party, denying all the contentions of the complainant as well as the liability cast upon him.  According to  opposite party No.1. he had not conducted any chitty business .  The passbook produced by the complainant is created for the case.  The opposite parties Pudukai Vainingat Sree Vairajathan  Easwaran Kshethra Committee  is a registered society under the  Societies Registration Act and Ist opposite party is the treasurer of the committee.  The said committee decided to construct a  Maha kshetram  of the deity  Shri Vairajathan  Easwaran  along with a  Kalyana  Mandapam, old age home and school building .  The cost estimated for the said construction was Rs. Ten crores/- .  It is decided by the opposite parties committee to raise the said amount by way of donations and collections from devotees and  public.  For the convenience of  the devotees and public the committee opened day deposit and SB account in various financial institutions.  Accordingly they made deposits.  In  the meanwhile the committee faced  some financial straits due to the payment of income tax.  Some donators demanded  return of donations given for constructions and adopted dubious methods to get back the said amount lying in various banks in the name of opposite parties committee.  The opposite parties committee being a donatory    is not liable to return the donations.  The relief sought is against opposite parties is opposed to the provisions of societies registration Act and the rules and regulations of the opposite parties committee.  As per the registered bye law opposite parties committee President alone is having power to represent  the committee.  The secretary has no right to represent the committee.  There is no privity of contract between the parties which could be  enforced in law as per the provisions of the prize  chits and money   circulation (Banning) Act 1978 on the  one hand and on the other hand it is opposed to public policy.  The !st    opposite party being the  treasurer of the society is not  liable  to be sued for recovery of the amount  allegedly  due  by the  society.  Opposite parties  No.1 & 3 were unnecessary party.  Hence the complaint is a defective for misjoinder of parties and hence liable to be dismissed.

3.     Complainant filed affidavit in support of his claim reiterating what is stated in the complaint.  The passbooks issued bearing the seal of opposite parties committee is produced and marked as Ext.A1.  Both sides heard and the documents produced.

4.     As against the allegations made by the complainant the opposite party No.1 has not produced any documents to substantiate his contentions .

5.     Ext.A1 produced by the complainant is apparently the  chitty passbook.  If it is a concocted one for  the purpose  of filing the complaint and  extort money from the opposite parties as alleged by the Ist opposite party, then of course opposite parties should have resorted appropriate legal proceedings against complainant for creating such false document.  But no such  proceedings are seen initiated by opposite parties.

6.  The registered bye law of the opposite parties society, the details of SB accounts opened in the Financial Institutions, the details of payment made as income tax etc are not produced to prove the veracity of the contention of the Ist   opposite party.  In the absence of such documents  it can safely conclude that Ext.A1is  the chitty passbook  issued by opposite parties to the complainant as part of their chitty transactions.

7.  The non- completion of chitty and the appropriation of chitty  amounts are  deficiency in service on the part of opposite parties.  It became more grave when  the chitty run by the opposite parties do not have the required license from the authorities.  This is nothing but  an unscrupulous  exploitation  of consumers.

            Therefore the complaint is allowed and the opposite parties 1 and 2 are jointly and severally directed to pay the chitty amount Rs.70,000/-  with interest @9% per annum from the  date of complaint till payment along with a cost of Rs.3,000/-.  Time for compliance is limited to 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of order.  Opposite party No.3 is exonerated from the liability.

    Sd/                                         Sd/                                    Sd/

MEMBER                             MEMBER                         PRESIDENT  

 

Exts.A1- chitty passbook

eva/

                                                           /Forwarded by Order/

                                                          Senior Superintendent

 

 

 




......................K.T.Sidhiq
......................P.P.Shymaladevi
......................P.Ramadevi