Kerala

Kottayam

CC/76/2018

K.M.Augustin - Complainant(s)

Versus

C.K.Chandran - Opp.Party(s)

Raju Abraham

20 Mar 2021

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/76/2018
( Date of Filing : 24 Apr 2018 )
 
1. K.M.Augustin
Kurichiyani House Thellakam P.O
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. C.K.Chandran
Idamala Puthenpurayil Kurichithanam Village Kurichathanam P.O
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Mar 2021
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 20th day of March, 2021

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 76/2018 (filed on 24-04-2018)

 

Petitioner                                          :         K.M. Augustine,

                                                                   Kurichiyani House,

                                                                   Thellakam P.O.

                                                                   Kottayam.

                                                                   (Adv. Thomas Joseph)

                                                                             Vs.                            

Opposite Parties                               :         C.K. Chandran,

                                                                   Idamala Puthenpurayil,

                                                                   Kurichithanam Village,

                                                                   Kurichithanam P.O.

                                                                   Kottayam.

                                                                   (Adv. Abraham Thomas)

 

                                                          O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant represented.  Opposite party absent.  Counsel for the complainant submitted that there is no instruction from complainant. Notice to complainant seen served.  Though the notice received by him the complainant did not appeared the Commission in last postings.  It is revealed by the conduct of the complainant that he is not interested in conducting case.  Hence the complaint is dismissed for default.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this 20th day of March, 2021.

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                 Sd/-  

                                                                                      By Order

                                                                           Senior Superintendent

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.