Kerala

StateCommission

A/10/318

DIVISIONAL MANGER,M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

C.H.ABDULLA KUNHI AND ANR - Opp.Party(s)

VARKALA.B.RAVIKUMAR

09 Jun 2011

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. A/10/318
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/04/2010 in Case No. CC22/2010 of District Kasaragod)
 
1. DIVISIONAL MANGER,M/S ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD
M.G.ROAD,KASARAGOD
KASARAGOD
KERALA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. C.H.ABDULLA KUNHI AND ANR
CHAPPADY HOUSE,EDANEER P.O
KASARAGOD
KERALA
2. THE MANAGER KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK LTD
BHAVANI HOUSING CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY,BANGALORE
BANGALORE
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

 

APPEAL  NO: 318/2010

 

JUDGMENT DATED:09-06-2011

 

PRESENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU              :  PRESIDENT

 

SHRI.S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR                             : MEMBER

 

The Branch Manager,

M/s Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.,

M.G.Road, Kasaragode.  Repd. by its-             : APPELLANT

Divisional manager, Divisional office-1,

Thakaraparambu, TVPM.

 

(By Adv:Sri.Varkala.B.Ravikumar)

 

          Vs.

 

1.      C.H.Abdulla Kunhi, S/o Abubacker Haji,

Chappady House, Edaneer.P.O,

Kasaragode.

 

(By Adv:Smt.Selvi.M)

                                                                   : RESPONDENTS

2.      The Manager,

Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.,

Shree Complex, Bhavani Hsg –

Co-operative Society, T Block,

Banasankari 4th stage,

Bangalore-560 085.

 

(By Adv:Sri.Narayan.R)

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                   

JUDGMENT

 

JUSTICE SHRI. K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

The appellants are the 2nd opposite party/insurance company in CC.22/10 in the file of CDRF, Kozhikkode.  The appellants are under orders to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- to the complainant.  The Forum has also directed the opposite party/financier to pay a sum of Rs.25,844 to the complainant.

2.      The matter is with respect to the vehicle purchased by the complainant in auction from the financier.  It is his case that the financier mis represented that the vehicle is having a live policy which was found to be false and he had to avail fresh policy and hence the complaint for the loss sustained in this regard.

3.      It was specifically pointed out by the counsel for the appellant that the appellant has been made only formal party in the complaint and that the relief’s sought for was only against the 1st opposite party/financier.  Paragraph 7 of the complaint specifically mentions that opposite party No.2 /appellant herein has been impleaded as formal party and no specific relief is claimed from the 2nd opposite party.  In the circumstances we find that the order of the Forum directing the appellant to pay Rs.10,000/- cannot be sustained.  Hence the above direction is set aside.  The appeal is allowed as above. 

Office will forward the LCR along with a copy of this order to the Forum.

 

 

JUSTICE K.R. UDAYABHANU:  PRESIDENT

 

 

 

S. CHANDRAMOHAN NAIR : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

VL.                                                              

 

 
 
[HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.