A.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ATHYDERABAD.
F.A. 1070/2007 against C.D. 136/2007 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad
Between:
1. Butterfly Service Centre
H.No. 3-6-726,RomanPlaza
Himayatnagar,
Hyderabad-500 209.
2.LaxmiSteelPalace
Shop No. 1, Saptagiri Commercial
Complex, Opp. K.P.H.B. Colony
Main Road, Kukatpally
Hyderabad-500 072.
3. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director
V. M. Balasubrahmaniam
No. 377, Anna Salai
Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.
4. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,
No. 143,Vandalaour Kelambakkam Road
PuthuppakkamVillage
Kanchipuram Dist.
Tamil Nadu-603 103.
Tamil Nadu.Smt. B. Girija
W/o. V. Ram Babu
H.No. 1-2-333/F
Domalguda,
Hyderabad-500 029.
Counsel for the Appellant:
HighCourtBuildings,
Counsel for the Respondent:
F.A. 1415/2007 against C.D. 136/2007 , Dist. Forum-III,Hyderabad
Between:
Smt. B. Girija
W/o. V. Ram Babu
H.No. 1-2-333/F
Domalguda,
Hyderabad-500 029.
1. Butterfly Service Centre
H.No. 3-6-726,RomanPlaza
Himayatnagar,
Hyderabad-500 209.
2.LaxmiSteelPalace
Shop No. 1, Saptagiri Commercial
Complex, Opp. K.P.H.B. Colony
Main Road, Kukatpally
Hyderabad-500 072.
3. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,
Rep. by its Managing Director
V. M. Balasubrahmaniam
No. 377, Anna Salai
Teynampet, Chennai-600 018.
4. Gandhimathi Appliances Ltd.,
No. 143,Vandalaour Kelambakkam Road
PuthuppakkamVillage
Kanchipuram Dist.
Tamil Nadu-603 103.
Tamil Nadu.Opposite PartiesCounsel for the Appellant:
Counsel for the Respondent:
HighCourtBuildings,
QUORUM:
MONDAY, THIS THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND EIGHT
Oral Order: (Per Hon’ble Justice D. Appa Rao, President)
Hyderabad
Hyderabad. She and her husband purchased an LPG from to R1 an her left part of the cheek, left ear, both lips, chest part, abdomen, both RemedyHospital
where she was kept in ICCU.
While admitting that R1 is the authorised service centre and R2 is the authorised dealer authorised dealer R2
He escorted her out of the kitchen
reason, when mechanic visited the house, he did not find out whether the this alleging
We may mention here
The learned counsel for the respondents
She ought to have sent the stove
The assessment of damages
a)
b)
She claimed an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs towards future expenses.
Coming to the aspect of compensation to be awarded to the complainant, admittedly she was admitted inRemedyHospital
ranging from
The principle
Considering the nature of inconvenience suffered, we compensate and drawing a particular