Delhi

North

CC/191/2014

BAKHTAWAR SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

BSES YAMUNA POWER - Opp.Party(s)

22 Jul 2014

ORDER

ROOM NO.2, OLD CIVIL SUPPLY BUILDING,
TIS HAZARI, DELHI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/191/2014
 
1. BAKHTAWAR SINGH
4564, DEPUTY GANJ, SADAR BAZAR, DELHI
DELHI
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. BSES YAMUNA POWER
BUSINESS MANAGER, ARAM BAGH, PAHAR GANJ, DELHI
DELHI
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sh. Babu Lal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. D.R. Tamta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Shahina MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Case No.191/2014

 

Bakhtawar Singh Vs. BSES Yamuna Power Ltd.

       

22.07.2014

Present:-  Complainant in person.

 

Complainant claimed himself to the owner of house No.4564, Deputy Ganj, Sadar Bazar, Delhi.  According to him the property was having a meter connection in the name of previous tenant for use of domestic purpose.  The complainant took possession of this premises on 01.02.2014 and applied for change of purpose of electricity from domestic to commercial.  He received a bill of Rs.6680/- in April 2014 and subsequently bill of Rs.11,240/- payment of which was made on 28.06.2014.  It is alleged that these bills are incorrect, therefore, he submits that O.P be directed to provide correct bill up to date, as per consumption of the electricity. 

2.     First of all in his complaint itself he has stated that he got the use of electricity connection changed from domestic to commercial, if it is so, he does not qualify to be a consumer.  Nowhere, it has been mention that he is running in commercial activity to earn livelihood, therefore, complainant does not qualify to be consumer.  Secondly, he stated that bill of Rs.6680/- and Rs.11240/- raised by O.P are incorrect, what are the reasons or correctness of bills has not been mentioned.  It is not his case that the meter is running fast.  He has not applied to the O.P to get the meter checked so that it could be said that the meter has been running fast.  It is not his case that the slabs charged in the bills are wrong or the actual consumption shown in the bill is not as per meter reading.  Merely, in the perception of the complainant that bill is excessive is no consumer dispute.  Complaint is therefore, dismissed.  File be consigned to record room.

 

  President                          Member                         Member 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sh. Babu Lal]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. D.R. Tamta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Shahina]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.