West Bengal

South 24 Parganas

CC/21/2022

Dinesh Chandra Rawat - Complainant(s)

Versus

Breathe Well Being Aurogreen Health Pvt. Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

10 Jan 2023

ORDER

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission
South 24 Parganas
Baruipur, Kolkata-700 144
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/2022
( Date of Filing : 27 Jan 2022 )
 
1. Dinesh Chandra Rawat
Bakhrahat Road, Samukpota, S 24 Pgs, 743503
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Breathe Well Being Aurogreen Health Pvt. Ltd.
Anchor House No. 60, Sector 31, Gurugram, 122001, Haryana
2. Sri Aditya Kaicker- Director
Anchor House No. 60, Sector 31, Gurugram, 122001, Haryana
3. Sri Rohan Verma- Director
Anchor House No. 60, Sector 31, Gurugram, 122001, Haryana
4. Sri Vaibhav Anand- Business Head
Anchor House No. 60, Sector 31, Gurugram, 122001, Haryana
5. Ms. Shivani Karma- Program Coordinator
Anchor House No. 60, Sector 31, Gurugram, 122001, Haryana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI ASHOKE KUMAR PAL PRESIDENT
  JAGADISH CHANDRA BARMAN MEMBER
  SMT. SANGITA PAUL MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 10 Jan 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 Sri Jagadish Chandra Barman,  Member

            The facts leading to the filing of the instant case by the complainant  may be epitomised as follows:-

    Being aggrieved upon the O. Ps., the Complainant [ Dinesh Chandra Rawat]  filed this instant case being no-21 of 2022 before this Ld. Commission on 27/01/2022 for proper adjudication and reliefs. As per complaint petition, the complainant was then and still now a diabetic patient and after finding out an online advertisement as to the treatment of diabetic disease, the complainant contacted with the personnel of the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd. The personnel told him that Diabetic disease could be recovered fully and for that purpose a contract for one year should be signed with the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd. by making payment Rs. 9,000=00 only . Thereafter, the O. Ps.  sent him [complainant] a payment link by Whatsapp vide  invoice id INVt313n6o5sOz201014. Accordingly, the Complainant paid Rs. 9,000.00 only on 14.01.2021 vide no BIL/ONL/000020923862/PAYUMONEY/INVOICING CHGSICICI BANK.  

           The petitioner was also persuaded by the coordinator that the program then was very simple to follow and for that purpose the complainant  was advised to download their mobile APP. It was downloaded by the petitioner and mobile App of the program was found clumsy. It was required to fill up as to the food, beverages, the complainant used to take regularly; exercise and walking that the complainant had been followed then.

         On 16th Jan. 2022, the petitioner informed to Mrs. Shibani Karma that he [Complainant] was not satisfied with the programme and requested to refund the paid amount Rs. 9,000.00 only to the complainant. Then Mr. Rshab asuured the petitioner over telephone that the O. Ps. would refund the paid amount.

           On 19th April 2022 the O. Ps. requested to send bank details of the Complainant. Accordingly, Bank details were sent by your petitioner. On 22nd April 2022, Mr. Vaibhab informed your petitioner that he [complainant] would not get back his paid amount Rs. 9,000.00 only as per the policy of the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd. Thereafter, the O. Ps. removed the name of your petitioner from the Whatsapp group to stop communication.

             Later, Mr. Vaibhab again assured your petitioner that O. Ps.  would refund his paid amount of Rs. 9000.00 only. On 28th April 2022, the O. Ps. informed your petitioner that many of them were suffering from Covid 19 and due to that payment was delaying. Just after one month, the petitioner checked with the Vaibhab  App and he could not find any payment in favour of the petitioner. On 16th June 2022, Mr. Vaibhab informed that your petitioner could not get back his paid amount Rs. 9000.00 only.

           Thereafter, the complainant sent a Notice to the O. Ps. to refund his paid amount of Rs. 9000.00 with compensation amount Rs. 1, 25,000.00 only for harassment. The O. Ps. did not reply and pay back  the money in question. Then the complainant sent his grievance to the NCH on 24.6.2021 vide grievance no- 2801109. But the O. Ps. did not pay any heed to the mental agony, harassment of the complainant. The NCH  then  sent a reminder on 5th July 2021 and 2nd reminder later to the O. Ps. but no reply was given by the O. Ps. The NCH issued an advice to lodge complaint on 12th July 2021 before the District Consumer Redressal Commission. The petitioner also did several communications with the O. Ps. but all communications were in vain.

            Finding no other alternative, the complainant has filed this instant case before this District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, 24 Parganas South, Baruipur , Kolkata -700144 for proper adjudication  and has sought for the following reliefs :-

              1.   To issue an order upon all the O. Ps.   to refund paid amount Rs. 9000/- only  to the complainant .

              2.   To issue an order upon the O. Ps.  to pay compensation amount Rs. 1, 25,000=00 only for unfair trade practice and deficiency of service.

              3.  To issue an order upon the O. Ps. to pay a litigation cost.

              4.   To issue an order upon the O. Ps. as the Ld. Commission may deem fit and proper.

       After receiving the complaint petition, this  Ld. Commission sent show cause notices to the O.Ps. and all the O. Ps. received the notices on 28/2/2022. But by filing Vokalatnama on 26th March 2022, the Ld. Advocates on behalf of the O. Ps. did not file their written version within the statutory period of 45 days. Hence, this instant case being no- CC/21/2022 was declared ‘Ex-parte’ on 30th May 2022.

Therefore, the content and averments of the O. Ps. are not known to us.  As a result this instant case is remained unchallenged.

         Upon the averments of the complaint petition, evidence on Affidavit, BNA etc. of the petitioner, the following points are formulated:-

 

POINTS FOR DETERMINATION

1].   Is the complainant ‘Consumer’?

2]    Are the O. Ps.  guilty of deficiency in services and unfair trade practice as alleged by the complainant?

3]      Is the complainant entitled to get relief /reliefs as prayed for?

 

EVIDENCES/BNA OF THE COMPLAINANT

 

   The complainant filed his ‘Evidence on Affidavit’ on 2nd August 2022 and BNA  on 13th December 2022.

 

DECISIONS WITH REASONS.

        The complainant was then a diabetic patient and after finding out an online advertisement as to the treatment of diabetic disease, the complainant contacted with the personnel of the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd. The personnel told him that Diabetic disease of any person could be recovered fully and for that purpose a contract for one year should be signed with the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd. by making payment Rs. 9,000=00 only . Thereafter, the O. Ps.  sent him [complainant] a payment link by Whatsapp vide  invoice id INVt313n6o5sOz201014. Accordingly, the Complainant paid Rs. 9,000.00 only on 14.01.2021 through ICICI Bank.

         Therefore, there is no doubt that the complainant is a  ‘Consumer’ under definition of Section 2 (7) of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the O. Ps. are service provider. Hence, point no. 1 is decided in favour of the Complainant but against the O. Ps.

           In relation to point for determination no. 2 ‘’Are the O. Ps.  guilty of deficiency in  services and unfair trade practice as alleged by the complainant?”,- it is very much worthy to mention that  the petitioner paid Rs. 9000=00 only to the Opposite Parties to get relief from the Diabetic Disease as per online advertisement. Thereafter he [complainant] communicated with many personnel like Dr.Shivani Karma [ program coordinator], Mr. Vaibhab Anand,  Mr. Rishab , Aditya Kaicker-Director, Rohan Verma-Director of the Breath Well Being Aurogreen Health Private Ltd.   and so on. But he could not get any relief from his Diabetic Disease. It was also requested by the petitioner to the O. Ps. that he [complainant] was not satisfied with clumsy App. Yet the  O. Ps. did not try to  make comprehensive their one year plan  due to the negligent and unfair attitude. Consequently, deficiency of services and unfair trade practices both  have been occurred on behalf of the O. Ps.

Hence, point no. 2 is decided in favour of the Complainant, but against the O. Ps.

           In relation to point no. 3, “ Is the complainant entitled to get relief /reliefs as prayed for ‘’- it is pertinent to mention that  the complainant had communicated several times through electronic platform  with the O.Ps. for getting services. But O. Ps. were not interested to pay any heed upon the required service, pain, mental agony and harassment of the Complainant. All the O. Ps. were very much eager to collect money. They also followed the technique to pass time without taking proper steps to refund the paid amount of Rs. 9000.00. Although the petitioner sent a notice claiming refund of his paid amount, O. Ps. did not response. The Complainant  also filed his grievances to the NCH on  24.6.2021. NCH had also taken many steps to recover the paid amount of the complainant; but all steps followed by NCH and the complainant were failed.

The O. Ps. did not refund the paid amount of Rs. 9000.00 only. So the complainant is entitled to get reliefs as  he has prayed for.

So point no 3 is also decided in favour of the Complainant and against the O. Ps.

Consequently, the complaint case  succeeds.

Hence, it is

 

                                                                                          ORDERED

 

            That the complaint case be and the same is hereby allowed  ‘Ex-parte’ against the Opposite Parties with a litigation cost of Rs. 10,000=00 (Rupees Ten thousand) only.

             The Opposite Parties are directed to refund to the complainant the paid amount of Rs. 9000.00 [Rs. Nine thousand] jointly or severally within 45 days from the date of issuing this Order with 10% p. a. simple interest till realisation from the date of payment  i. e. 14.01.2021 .

             The Opposite Parties are directed to pay jointly or severally Rs. 20,000.00 [Rs. Twenty thousand] only as compensation amount to the complainant within 45 days from the date of issuing this order for their deficiency in service and unfair trade practice as well as for mental agony, pain and harassment already suffered.

      Amount of Litigation Cost and Compensation amount should be paid within 45 days from the date of issuing this Order. Otherwise, 10% p. a. simple interest upon compensation amount and litigation Cost shall be borne by the O. Ps. jointly or severally till realization.

        The Complainant is  at liberty to submit an Execution Case against the O. Ps.  before this Ld. Commission for non-compliance of the Order  after the expiry of 45 days from the date.

             Let copies of the order be supplied to all the parties concerned in either speed post /registered post free of cost as per rule.

            The final order be also available in www.confonet.nic.in  .

 

Prepared  and Corrected by me.

 

 

  ( Jagadish Chandra Barman)                             

            (MEMBER)     

 
 
[ SHRI ASHOKE KUMAR PAL]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ JAGADISH CHANDRA BARMAN]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT. SANGITA PAUL]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.