West Bengal

Hooghly

CC/98/2018

Sunil Kumar Sabui - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch manager, United Bank of India - Opp.Party(s)

05 Oct 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, HOOGHLY
CC OF 2013
PETITIONER
VERS
OPPO
 
Complaint Case No. CC/98/2018
( Date of Filing : 17 Jul 2018 )
 
1. Sunil Kumar Sabui
Namarer Bagan 3rd lane, Po- Gondannagar
Hooghly
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch manager, United Bank of India
Chandanagore
Hooghly
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Biswanath De PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Smt. Devi Sengupta MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 05 Oct 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Complainant’s case is that complainant is a defence pensioner having PPO No.C/Fys/21572/2000.  He draws his pension from United Bank of India vide account No.0412010176303.  The pension sanctioning authority is Controller of Defence Account (Pension).  Bank is the service provider.  It is alleged that bank deducted some amount of money laid down in 4(b) of the petition.  Complainant raised objection but no result.    Then complainant approached to Hon’ble Tribunal, Calcutta Bench.  The Hon’ble Tribunal concluded vide its order dated 10.5.2018 that the bank is not under GOI (vide para-5 of the complaint). Being dissatisfied with the decision of the CAT, Kolkata the complainant has filed this petition to settle his complaint.  The complainant also cited different decision in his favour that the complainant is a consumer. 

            Later on complainant has advanced argument in the complaint citing with decision of the Hon’ble Apex Court.  In para-19 he stated that he was upset with the decision of CAT, Calcutta Bench.  In this context complainant prayed some relief.

            We perused the paper filed with this complaint regarding deduction and we also perused the paper of defence PPI 2013.

The complainant has filed this case against the Branch Manager, Bank of India, Hooghly. 

Perused the entire plaint and other documents.  After contemplation we find that this case is not maintainable in this Forum.  Accordingly, the case is dismissed being not maintainable and not admitted.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Biswanath De]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE Smt. Devi Sengupta]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Sri Samaresh Kr. Mitra]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.