DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,

                                                                            KANDHAMAL , PHULBANI

                                                          C.C.NO.12 OF 2014

Present : Sri Rabindranath Mishra - President .

Miss Sudhira Laxmi Pattanaik - Member .

Sri Chakadola Malick - Member .

Smt. Ashadevi Kanhar, aged – 60 years

W/O: Late Mahendra Kanhar.

Village – Rujangi ( Bandha Sahi)

PO: Pakanagon PS: Sadar. Dist : Kandhamal ….............. Complainant .

Versus.

Branch Manager, State Bank of India,

Phulbani Branch At/PO: Main Road , Phulbani

PS: Phulbani Town . Dist : kandhamal …................ Opp,. Parties .

For the Complainant : Self .

For the Opp. Party : Sri Suresh Ch. Mahapatra & H. Maharana, Advocates .

Date of Order : 24-06-2014

                                                                                                  O R D E R

The case of the Complainant in short is that she is a pension holder and she is getting her pension through the Opposite Parties vide her pass book No. 31629282662 . But she was not getting pension from O.P .Bank from the month of May 2011 . Hence , she has filed this Complaint through Counseling center claiming compensation of Rs. 10,000/- from the Opposite Parties .

The case of the Opposite parties as per their version is that the Complainant was getting his family pension from the District Treasury , Phulbani and subsequently from the O.P Bank .So, necessary papers were sent by the Treasury to the Central Pension Processing Cell Rasulgargh, Bhubaneswar and was duly processed . Accordingly on 27-12-2013 the alleged claim amount with up to-date interest i.e Rs.11,410/- was credited in the account of the Complainant instead of claim amount of Rs. 10,500/- Hence, the Opposite Party has not committed any deficiency in service .

We have heard the learned counsel of the Opposite Parties in absence of the Complainant . As the Complainant has received her pension in the mean time there is no merit in her complaint petition . There is also no suitable evidence regarding any negligence of the Opposite parties in the matter . The Complainant is also not a Consumer as per provision of the C.P Act . Hence , the Complaint is dismissed as not maintainable in the eye of law .

                              MEMBER                                         MEMBER                                           PRESIDENT