Orissa

Jharsuguda

CC/61/2015

Sahnaj Khatun W/O-Mohammad Ali - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager,Panjab National Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Abdul Zalil

29 Apr 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM JHARSUGUDA.
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/61/2015
 
1. Sahnaj Khatun W/O-Mohammad Ali
At/Po-Lamitibahal,Brajrajnagar,Ps-Brajrajnagar
Jharsuguda
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager,Panjab National Bank
Brajrajnagar Branch,PO/Ps-Brajrajnagar
Jharsuguda
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sundar lal Behera PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 29 Apr 2016
Final Order / Judgement

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, JHARSUGUDA

                                        

CONSUMER  COMPLAINT  CASE NO. 61 OF 2015

 

Sahnaj Khatun, ( 40 Yrs.),

W/O: Mohammad Ali,

R/O: Lamtibahal, PS: Brajrajnagar,

Dist-.Jharsuguda, Odisha…….………………………………..……………. Complainant.

     

                                           Versus 

 

Branch Manager,

Punjab National Bank, Brajrajnagar Branch,

PO/PS: Brajrajnagar,

Dist: Jharsuguda, Odisha…..................................................................... Opp. Party.

 

Counsel for the Parties:-

 

For the Complainant                                      Abdul Zalil, Adv. & Associates.

For the Opp. Party                                        Shri K.C. Agrawal, Adv. & Associates.

 

Date of Order: 29.04.2016

                                                            

                                                                                                    Present

 

                                                                                      1. Shri S.L. Behera, President.

                                                                                      2. Smt. A.Nanda, Sr. Member.

 

Shri S. L. Behera, President : - The brief facts of the complainant’s case is that the complainant is a saving bank account holder of O.P’s Punjab National Bank, Brajrajnagar Branch having account No. 4019000100063545 issued on dtd. 01.10.2014 and the same is operating by the complainant. Due to alleged  freez of the said S/B Account by the O.P Bank without the consent of the complainant causing disruption of the Bank transaction the complainant could not operate her account since dtd. 12.05.2015. After enquiry from the O.P Bank the complainant could able to know that as because she is an introducer  

                   of one Sheela Ghasi at the opening of the new account in the name of Sheela Ghasi and  due to dispute on the account of Sheela Ghasi Bank account of her husband  and the Bank account of the complainant were freez by the Bank.  The O.P Bank contested the case and in its written version do not dispute with the S/B account of the complainant and submitted that on the verbal inquiry of the Brajrajnagar Police officials concerning the account of Sheela Ghasi along with account of the complainant with her husband were freezen temporarily till completion of inquiry and to protect the interest of the Bank as well as the account holder from any unauthorized transaction in the said S/B account of the Sheela Ghasi and the complainant.  It is further submitted that as per the order of the Hon’ble Forum S/B Account of the complainant has been released and the account is in operation. 

The complaint petition was filed on dt.22.08.2015 and after its admission, this Forum has passed interim order on dtd. 03.09.2015 directing the O.P. Bank to resume the operation of S/B Account of the complainant and the operation of the account is continue till date.  The explanation placed by O.P.Bank relating to freezon of the account appears to be probable as and when police inquiry concerning to a particular bank account was continuing, obviously the particular disputed account can be freezed by the Bank.  But the Bank is not empower to freez the account of introducer of the disputed account as the role of introducer is only to identified the person for opening a new account as because the introducer is having his/ her account in the said Bank. 

However when the complainant has not sustained any loss due to the freezon of the account, we think the O.P. Bank shall not saddled with deficiency in service in respect to the complainant.  Accordingly the case is dismiss and disposed of with a direction to the O.P Bank not to act this type of fault in future.

Order pronounced in the open court today the 29th   day of April’ 2016 and copy of this order shall be supplied to the parties as per rule. 

                                                                I Agree.         

                                                                                                          

                                                            A.Nanda, Sr.Member           S.L.Behera, President          

                                      Dictated and corrected by me.

 

                                     S.L.Behera, President          

 

       

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sundar lal Behera]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.