Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/30/2020

Sanil Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch manager,New India Assurances Company - Opp.Party(s)

04 Aug 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/30/2020
( Date of Filing : 28 Jan 2020 )
 
1. Sanil Das
kottamukal kunnel veedu,JubileeNagar,Vattapara,Trivandrum
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch manager,New India Assurances Company
Kallingal junction,Nedumangadu,Trivandrum
2. Surveyor,New India Assurances Company
kallingal Junction,Nedumangadu,Trivandrum
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 04 Aug 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACAUD : THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

PRESENT

 

SRI.  P.V. JAYARAJAN                              :           PRESIDENT

SMT. PREETHA G. NAIR                           :           MEMBER

SRI. VIJU  V.R.                                             :           MEMBER

C.C.No. 30/2020 Filed on 24/01/2020

ORDER DATED: 04/08/2022

 

Complainant

:

Sanil Das.G.S., Kottamukal Kunnel Veedu, Jubilee Nagar Vattappara, Thiruvananthapuram – 695 028.

                  (By Adv.K.Prasannakumar)

Opposite parties

:

  1. The Branch Manager, New India Assurance Company Ltd., Kallingal Junction, Nedumangad – 695 541.

(By Adv.Sreevaraham.G.Satheesh)

  1. Surveyor, New India Assurance Company Ltd., Kallingal Junction,  Nedumangad – 695 541.

 

ORDER

 

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN: PRESIDENT

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of Consumer Protection Act 1986 and the matter stood over to this date for consideration.After hearing the matter the commission passed an order as follows:

This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties.  After admitting the complaint, notice was issued to the opposite parties.  The 1st opposite party entered appearance and filed written version denying the allegation raised by the complainant.  The notice issued to 2nd opposite party was served and as the 2nd opposite party not appeared, this Commission declared the 2nd opposite party as ex parte.  As the complainant was continuously absent, this Commission issued a notice to the complainant.  The said notice was accepted by the complainant, but failed to appear before this Commission today to further proceed with this complaint.  The complainant also not filed proof affidavit to establish his case.  In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.

In the result the complaint is dismissed for default.  There will be no order as to cost.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Court, this the 04th day of August,  2022.

 

Sd/-

P.V. JAYARAJAN

:

PRESIDENT

Sd/-

PREETHA G. NAIR

 

:

 

      MEMBER

Sd/-

VIJU  V.R.

:

MEMBER

 

R

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.