Orissa

Jajapur

CC/60/2019

Anil Kumar Samal. - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager,Bijaya Bank. - Opp.Party(s)

Srikanta Mohapatra,Shakti Kanta Nayak.

27 Nov 2020

ORDER

                           DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAJPUR.

                                           C. C. Case No.60/2019.

Anil kumar Samal,

 S/O. Madhusudan Samal

Vill-P.O.  Kalyanpur,P.s-Binjharpur,

Dist.-Jajpur.                                                                                            …………….. Complainant.

                                   

                        (Versus)

  1. Branch Manager,Bijaya Bank,At/P.O .Fatepur,P.S.Binjharpur ,Dt.Jajpur.
  2. Branch Manager, Oriental Insruance Co.Ltd, At. Kamhaipui ,P.O.Jajpur Road
  3. Dt.Jajpur Proprietor ,Sai Motors ,Jajpur singhpur Road,P.O.Singhpur,Dt.Jajpur .
  4. R.T.O,Jajpur.

                                                                                                                             ……………. O.P. Parties. 

 

O R D E R  DT. 27.11.2020

 

A compromise petition was filed on 09.11.20 duly signed by the petitioner and O.p.no.3 who is the proprietor of Sai Motors ,Jajpur Singhpur Road ,Singhpur,Jajpur . Both of them wanted to settle the dispute between themselves with the prayer to direct the O.p.no.4 to change the Registration  no. of the vehicle  bearing engine no.E94LH1812982 ,chasis no.MD626E94XHIL09373 in the name of the petitioner. In the written objection the O.P.no.4 (R.T.O, Jajpur ) dt.13.11.20  submitted that the compromise petition filed by the petitioner and O.p.no.3 is not maintainable  as the above vehicle bearing Enginee No.EG4LH1812982 and chasis No.MD626EG4XH1L09373  have been duly registered by the O.p in the name of Manas ku.Bindhani, S/O Gouranga Bindhani, Vill.Binjharpur on 16.12.2017  bearing Regd. No.OD-34-E-5235. Basing upon the documents it can not be changed but to put an  end to the above dispute the registration of the vehicle can not be transferred as per due process of law. The contention of O.p.no.4, the O.p.no.4 being not a party to the compromise petition . The same should not be accepted. Lastly the O.p.no.4 contended that he being not a party to the compromise petition is not bound by the  compromise petition .

            Heard both the sides  at length in the matter .

            Since the petitioner purchased the above vehicle from O.p.no.3 and they both have signed the compromise petition without any reservation the same should be accepted. In the result the O.p.no.4 (R.T.O,Jajpur) is hereby directed to transfer the said vehicle bearing Engine no.EG4LH1812982 , Chassis No.MD626EG4XH1L09373  in the name of the petitioner Anil Ku.Samal S/O Madhusudan Samal ,Vill/P.O. Kalyanpur,P.S.Binjharpur, Dt.Jajpur to end the dispute as contended by O.P no.4.

            Accordingly the matter stands disposed  of .  

 

 

L  A D Y M E M B E R.                            M E M B E R.                      P R E S I D E N T.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.