Orissa

Ganjam

EA/02/2014

Sri Satyanarayan Satapathy - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Through Sri B.S.Misra, Advocate for the D.H.R.

08 Jun 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, GANJAM, BERHAMPUR.
 
Execution Application No. EA/02/2014
( Date of Filing : 15 Jan 2014 )
In
CC/73/2010
 
1. Sri Satyanarayan Satapathy
S/o. Late Sibram Satapathy, At. Preeti fresh corner, Infront of gokeneswar temple, New bus stand road, Gate bazar, Berhampur
Ganjam
Odisha
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager
M/s. Tata Motors Finance Ltd. Gurudwar singh subha complex, Unit - III, Janapath, Kharvela nagar, Bhubaneswar
Khurda
Odisha
2. M/S Tata Motors Finance Ltd
Bezzola complex 1st floor, V.N.Purav, Chamber, Mumbai - 400071, Registered office - Nanavati Mahalaya 3rd floor 18 homi mody street, mumbai - 400001
3. Ananta Ram Padhy
Authorized distributor, singer sewing machine & application, Marela complex, Fire station road, Berhmpur
Ganjam
Odisha
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:Through Sri B.S.Misra, Advocate for the D.H.R., Advocate for the Appellant 1
 Through Sri Nalini Kanta Dash, Deepak Kumnar Sukla, Laxmi Narayan Dash, Advocates for the JDRs, Advocate for the Respondent 1
Dated : 08 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

 

                                                            DATE OF DISPOSAL: 08.06.2023

 

 

 

            The Ld. Advocate for the JDRs is present on 29.05.2023 and submitted about the Not Press Memo Dtd:10.07.2019 filed by the DHR through his Advocate on 14.11.2019 which was countersigned by the Ld. Counsel for the JDR. Heard and on perusal of case, it appears that, the advocate for DHR filed a memo dated 10.07.2019 wherein stated that, ‘the DHR received the NOC and other relevant papers with full and final satisfaction from the JDR. Hence the DHR does not want to proceed further in the matter and it may Not pressed or withdraw.’ Accordingly, a notice was issued vide this office Letter No. 636 dated 25.11.2019 to the complainant. As the D.H.R. does not want to proceed further of this case, we closed this case as ‘Not Press’ or ‘Withdrawn.’

A certified copy of this order be provided to all the parties free of cost as mandated by the Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The file is to be consigned to the record room along with a copy of this order.

 

 

 

                          

 

Pronounced on 08.06.2023. 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Satish Kumar Panigrahi]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Saritri Pattanaik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.