Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/13/239

P.V.Kunhambu - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

20 Oct 2014

ORDER

order
order
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/239
 
1. P.V.Kunhambu
Puthiya Veetil, Near Nandhavanam, Muzhakkoth, Kloikode - 671313
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager
Jyothis Collection Centre, 40/8942 C, 2nd Floor, Bengachery Complex, T B Road Junction, Main Road, Kanhangad - 671315
Kasaragod
Kerala
2. Manager Director
Devdhan Lottery Services (DLS), 40/8942 C, 2nd Floor, CRH Complex, M.G.Road, Ernakulam - 682035
Ernakulam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 

D.o.F:15/10/20143

D.o.O:20/10/2014

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KASARAGOD

                                          CC.NO.239/13

                  Dated this, the 20th    day of October 2014

 

PRESENT:

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

SMT.BEENA K.G               : MEMBER

SMT.SHIBA.M.SAMUEL    : MEMBER

P.V.Kunhambu, Puthiya Veettil,

Near Nandavanam, Muzhakoth, Claikkod,                               : Complainant

(in person)

1.Branch Manager, Jyothis Collection Centre,

Bankocheri Complex, T.B.Road, Junction  ,                   : Opposite parties

Main Road, Kanhangad.

2.Managing Director, Devadhan Lottery  Services(DLS),

40/8942 C, 2nd floor, CRH Complex, M.G.Road,

Ernakulam.682035                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         

(Adv.M.Narayanan,Hosdurg)

                                                                   ORDER

SMT.P.RAMADEVI            : PRESIDENT

 

The complainant in brief is as follows;

  Complainant joined the LIS Deepasthabam Project conducted by the opposite parties and subscribed  units worth Rs.1250/- in the year 2005.  On due date the complainant was entitled to get Rs.2485/- When the LIS project  faced some legal problems due to the intervention of govt. authorities  the opposite party suggested the complainant to transfer Rs.2000/- to the Jyothis  Project which was also conducted by the Ist opposite party and  agreed to refund with  100%  growth within 50 weeks  and further  the  Ist opposite party undertakes to pay the balance amount of Rs.485/- within 20 days.  Complainant agreed the above suggestion of 2nd  opposite party and transferred  the above  amount of  Rs.2000/- to Jyothis Project.  But on attaining the maturity date opposite party failed to pay the deposited amount as well as the balance amount.  The opposite party evaded  the payment in one pretext or the  other.  The opposite party told the complainant that there is a case is pending before the  Hon’ble  High Court  and the property belongs to opposite party are attached by the court and they are ready to pay the amount after the disposal of the case.  Believing the words of opposite party the complainant was waiting  for the disposal of the case of opposite party but now the complaint came to know that the opposite party is settling the claims of depositors.  Hence this complaint is filed for necessary relief.

2.   Ist opposite party served notice and appeared through counsel and filed their version.  In the version  opposite party taken a specific contention that the complaint is barred by limitation.  Notice to 1st  opposite party returned unserved with an endorsement door closed.  Complainant filed memo stating that he is not seeking any  relied from  1st  opposite party.  After filing the version the case was taken up in the adalat as per the  written request of opposite party.  Most of the cases of similar nature were settled in the adalat and in this case the opposite party told that the complainants deposit is not seen in the computer.  But the opposite party have no case that they paid the amount to the complainant.  If the computer system of opposite party is defective, who is responsible for?.

  Complainant filed proof affidavit and Ext.A1 marked.

3.   Here  the  opposite parties specific contention is that the complaint is barred by limitation.  While hearing the complaint it is the specific case of the complainant that  till the date of filing the complaint, the complainant approached the opposite parties each and every month and as per the undertaking given  by the opposite party he has not filed the complaint earlier.  According to  complainant last date of promise made by him was in the year 2012 and the  cause of  action arose in the year 2012 only and the complaint is filed within time.

4.   Considering the nature and circumstances of the case we are of the view that the opposite parties might have promised the payment in the year 2012.  Moreover they are settling similar  case in the adalath.  Due to the  defect in the computer system of the opposite parties the complainant’s case was not settled.  Hence we allow the  complaint.

     

  Therefore complaint is allowed  directing the 2nd  opposite party  to  refund Rs.2485/- the amount deposited  by the complainant with interest @10% per annum from the date of complaint till payment and  2nd  opposite party is further directed to pay Rs.2000/- towards cost of the proceedings.  Time for  compliance is  30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

 

Ext.A1-Provisional Acceptance Statement

Sd/                                                                                              Sd/                                                            Sd/

MEMBER                                               MEMBER                            PRESIDENT

eva

 

/Forwarded by Order/

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. P.RAMADEVI]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Shiba.M.Samuel]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.