Kerala

Idukki

CC/10/102

Boby S/o Joseph - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Baby Lukose& Adv.Ramani P.K

21 Jul 2010

ORDER


CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKIConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Idukki, Kuyilimala, Painavu PO-685603
Complaint Case No. CC/10/102
1. Boby S/o JosephThekkumcherikunnel(H),PottenkaduP.OIdukkiKerala ...........Appellant(s)

Versus.
1. Branch ManagerState Bank of Travancore,Pottenkadu branch,pottenkadu P.OIdukkiKerala2. The Tahsildar(RR)Taluk Office, NedumkandamIdukkiKerala3. The Village OfficerVillage Office, RajakkaduIdukkiKerala ...........Respondent(s)



BEFORE:
HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan ,PRESIDENTHONORABLE Sheela Jacob ,MemberHONORABLE Bindu Soman ,Member
PRESENT :

Dated : 21 Jul 2010
JUDGEMENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

 

DATE OF FILING: 13.05.2010

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, IDUKKI

Dated this the 21st day of July, 2010


 

Present:

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN PRESIDENT

SMT.SHEELA JACOB MEMBER

SMT.BINDU SOMAN MEMBER

C.C No.102/2010

Between

Complainant : Bobby S/o Joseph,

Thekkumcherikunnel House,

Pottankadu P.O,

Idukki District.

(By Adv: Baby Lukose)

And

Opposite Parties : 1. The Manager,

State Bank of Travancore,

Pottankadu Branch,

Pottankadu P.O,

Idukki District.

(By Adv:Babichen.V.George.)

2. The Tahsildar(RR),

Udumbanchola Taluk Office,

NedumkandamP.O,

Idukki District.

3. The Village Officer,

Rajakkadu Village Office,

Rajakkadu P.O,

Idukki District.

O R D E R

SRI.LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)


 

Complainant absent. No representation. Opposite party appeared through counsel. Complainant is continuously absent. Hence the petition dismissed with a direction to the Ist opposite party to issue statement of accounts of the complainant's loan as per the request of the complainant, which is the main relief in the petition and a lenient view may be taken in the calculation of interest of the complainant's loan.

Pronounced in the Open Forum on this the 21st day of July, 2010
 

Sd/-

SRI. LAIJU RAMAKRISHNAN(PRESIDENT)

 

Sd/-

SMT. SHEELA JACOB(MEMBER)

Sd/-
 

 

SMT. BINDU SOMAN(MEMBER)

 

 


 

 

 


[HONORABLE Sheela Jacob] Member[HONORABLE Laiju Ramakrishnan] PRESIDENT[HONORABLE Bindu Soman] Member