Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.
This is a petition filed by the complainant U/s. 35 of C.P.Act, 1986.
2. The case of the complainant is that he is the permanent residence of Bijigol,NTPC Kaniha of Angul District and the opp.parties are the finance company running their profitable business at Angul District. The complainant has purchased a truck bearing Model No. LPK 3118TC after getting finance of Rs.28,79,968.00 from the opp.parties on 27.10.2018.After few months of purchase on 22.10.2019 the truck was met with an accident and fully damaged. Thereafter the complainant filed a full damaged claim before the opp.parties along with the insurance company. Due to non-payment of full damage claim by the opp.parties and the insurance company the complainant has filed a Case No. 47 of 2020 before this Hon’ble Commission in the month of August, 2020. On 16.04.2021 the opp.parties and the insurance company has settled the matter by filing a joint compromise petition and the case was closed. In the month of July, 2021 the opp.parties contacted the complainant over telephone and shows their interest & willing to provide a loan in favour of the complainant. The complainant refused to take loan, for which the opp.parties threatened the complainant to put his account in blacklist and to disturb the score of his CIBIL. In the month of September 2021 the complainant has applied for a loan from the Central Bank of India for purchase of a truck under SRTO scheme to maintain his livelihood but the said bank refused to sanction the loan in favour of the complainant as the CIBIL score is 698 as on 06.09.2021 and vehicle loan was settled with write of account on his name and closed on 28.04.2021. The aforesaid bank advised the complainant to rectify the CIBIL as soon as possible. The complainant has filed this case due to negligence , deficiency in service and unfair trade practice of the opp.parties. The complainant has paid the full and final balance arrear amount to the opp.parties as per the joint settlement petition filed by the parties before this Hon’ble Commission after issuing No Objection Certificate, showing written off total Rs. 1,50,987 in or before Trans Union, so the CIBIL is quite illegal in nature. Hence this case.
3. Notices were issued to the opp.parties through Regd. post with A.D on 30.10.2021. From the A.Ds of opp.parties it transpires that they have received the notices issued by this Commission . Inspite of notice non of the opp.parties turned up to file their show cause and contest the case.
4. Admittedly the complainant has purchased a truck on 27.10.2018 by availing finance from the opp.parties. It is alleged by the complainant at paragraph- 5 of his complaint that in the month of August, 2020 he filed C.C. No. 47 2020 which was disposed of in terms of compromise between the parties on 16.04.2021. It is further alleged that although the complainant has repaid the loan , according to the law the CIBIL score of the complainant was shown as 698 on 06.09.2021 for which the complainant is unable to avail the loan from a bank to purchase a truck. Although the opp.parties have received the money in view of the settlement, the CIBIL score shown relating to the complainant has due to negligence and there is deficiency in service of the opp.parties. The opp.parties have adopted unfair trade practice.
On perusal of the case it transpires that the notices were issued to the opp.parties through Regd.post with A.Ds. The A.D cards of both the opp.parties are available on the case record , which shows that the receipt of the notice issued by this Commission .The opp.parties neither appeared nor filed their show cause .They have also not contested the case.
5. The complainant has not filed the certified copy of the order passed by this Commission in C.C. No. 47 of 2020 on 16.04.2021 . He has also not filed the certified copy of the joint compromise petition filed in that case. In absence of such documents it cannot be said that there was a joint compromise between the parties for which , the opp.parties have waived the out standing dues pending against the complainant in terms of compromise. So it cannot be said that the CIBIL score dtd. 06.09.2021 shown by the opp.parties is wrong. The complainant failed to prove his case.
6. Hence order :-
: O R D E R :
The case be and the same is dismissed against both the opp.parties.