Orissa

Jharsuguda

CC/31/2017

Satnam Singh S/O- Sukdev Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager, Tata Moters Finance Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Abdul Zalil

19 Jul 2017

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM JHARSUGUDA.
ODISHA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/31/2017
 
1. Satnam Singh S/O- Sukdev Singh
AT- Gumadera,PO/PS- Belpahar
Jharsuguda
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager, Tata Moters Finance Ltd.
AT-Sambalpur Branch,AT- Balaji Towers, GM College Road, Sambalpur, PO/PS-Sambalpur
Sambalpur
Odisha
2. Chandan Srivastav S/O- Akhiles Srivastav
Collaction Agent Tata Moter Financeltd. AT- Mahavir Nagar, Brajrajnagar ,PO/PS- Brajrajnagar
Jharsuguda
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sundar lal Behera PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. SANTOSH KUMAR OJHA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 19 Jul 2017
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

 

19.07.2017                       Today the case is fixed for order.  The O.Ps. filed Non-Maintainability Petition in early date on which hearing was taken up from both the sides in length.  The O.Ps. raised objection on the point of having of “Consumer” on complainant as per the provision of the Consumer Protection Act,1986. 

 

On perusal of materials available on record it is found that, the vehicle bearing Regn. No. OD-23-A-4843 is in the name of “MS KOSHAL CARRIER” partner Satnam Singh, hypothecated by the Tata Motors Finance Ltd.,BBSR.  MS KOSHAL CARRIER is a partnership firm executed through a Deed of Partnership on dtd. 04.12.2009 and as per clause-13 of the said deed, the complainant can represent his firm. As per clause-7, the complainant is entitled to get remuneration of Rs.5,000/- per month on the basis of clause-8 but also as per clause-10 the complainant receives 50% share of the net profit and loss after payment of interest and remuneration to the partners.  Moreover it is also found that, the complainant has executed several power of attorney in favour of different individuals on his individual capacity in relation to several commercial vehicles on which several Consumer Cases have been filed in this Hon’ble Forum itself. It reveals that the said Ms Koshal Carrier has taken several commercial loans. It also reveals that the complainant being a partner of the partnership firm entitles for profits with remuneration has taken several commercial loans which cannot be treated to be maintaining of his merely livelihood but for earning profits thereon.

 

However in the interest of justice after admission hearing from the complainant he was provided interim relief until further order but after appearance of O.Ps the facts of the dispute have come out. 

 

The above mentioned facts and circumstances does not satisfy the definition of ‘Consumer’ mentioned U/s. 2(1)(d) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 hence, the Non-Maintainability Petition filed by the O.Ps is hereby allowed and the Complaint Case is not maintainable and dismissed.

 

                 Accordingly the case is disposed of.

 

 

 

            Member (W)                          Member                                          President.  

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sundar lal Behera]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. ANAMIKA NANDA]
MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. SANTOSH KUMAR OJHA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.