Aggrieved by the concurrent findings and orders passed by the Fora below, i.e., order dated 29.06.2010 passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kawardha and order dated 05.12.2011 passed by the Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, the petitioner / complainant feeling uncontended has approached this Commission for upgradation of the relief so granted by the Fora below. 2. We have heard Mr. R.K. Bhawnani, Advocate, counsel for the petitioner and have considered his submissions. He points out that the quantum of compensation granted by the Fora below is not commensurate with the loss and injury suffered by the complainant having regard to the area of agricultural land on which the seeds were shown and crop was raised. We have noted down these submissions only to be rejected because the fora below have taken great pains in examining the whole matter even the extent of the land in which the seeds were shown and crops were raised. In our opinion, compensation of Rs.33,049/- in RP No. 832/2012 and Rs.18,219/- in RP No. 833/2012 are fully justified. There is no case for upgradation of the said relief. The revision petitions being devoid of any merit are dismissed.