View 19710 Cases Against Sahara India
View 19710 Cases Against Sahara India
Seshadev Pradhan, filed a consumer case on 22 Aug 2022 against Branch Manager, Sahara India in the Sambalpur Consumer Court. The case no is CC/29/2022 and the judgment uploaded on 24 Aug 2022.
PRESIDENT, DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SAMBALPUR
Consumer Case No- 29/2022
Present-Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, President,
Sri. Sadananda Tripathy, Member,
Seshadev Pradhan,
S/O- Late Bhagwan Pradhan,
R/O-At-Kolgaon, Po-Keshapali, PS-Jujomura
Dist-Sambalpur. ………..…..Complainant
Vrs.
Branch Manager, Sahara India,
Dhanupali Branch,
At/PO/Ps-Dhanupali,
Dist-Sambalpur-768005 .. ………..Opp. Party
Counsels:-
DATE OF HEARING : 11.07.2022, DATE OF JUDGEMENT : 22.08.2022
Presented by Dr. Ramakanta Satapathy, PRESIDENT,
Issue No. 1 Whether the Complainant is not a consumer of the O.P?
The Co-operative Organization registered under the Multi-State Co-operative societies Act, 2002 based on principal of Co-operation. The organization is based on members contribution and the members are having special rights, obligations, privileges and duties to-wards the co-operative societies. For registration purpose of the Co-op. Societies and to stand up a society members are required. This is the one side of the organization. The other side of the organization is that the business activities run by he Co-operatives are the investment made by the member. The Co-operative are profit-making organization and through the investment earns profit from business and get the entity of a business organization.
Under the veil of membership the O.P. is doing Banking business and earning profit. As in investor, the members are investing money and re investing the said amount the O.P. is giving the maturity value which includes interest and not dividend. As a financial institution, the O.P. is taking benefit from the customer, entered in to agreement to pay maturity value of Rs. 13,861/- against Rs. 11,050/- and Rs. 12,042/- against Rs. 9600/- It is purely a banking business and the Complainant is a ‘customer’ and ‘Consumer’ of the O.P.
Accordingly, the issue is answered against the O.P.
Issue No.2 Whether this complaint is not maintainable in view of special provision under the Multi-state Co-operative Societies Act, 2002.
In the Multi-state Co-operatives Societies Act, 2002 Special Provision of dispute resolution is provided u/s 84 of the Act. relating to constitution, management or business of the Society. No where in the Act any provision is there that consumer can not go beyond the said Act. The Consumer Protection Act, 2019 is a special beneficial legislation for the welfare of the Consumers and to protect their interest. In addition to the Multi-State Co-operatives Act, 2002 the consumer sort for alternative remedy and there is no bar to sort Redressal before this Commission. Accordingly, as an alternative mode as no any arbitration has been preferred by the parties, this Commission has jurisdiction to entertain the complaint.
Issue is answered accordingly.
Issue No.3 Whether the O.P. is deficient in providing service?
The O.P. agreed to pay Rs. 13,861/- on 28.03.2020 against certificate No. 438000173692 and Rs. 12,042/- against certificate No. 438000173693 to the Complainant but failed to pay. Hard earnings of the Complainant when blocked, not paid in time, after advocate notice dated 17.03.2022 also remained silent, this complaint was preferred. The O.P. harassed the Complainant and compelled to sort Redressal before the Commission. This amounts to deficiency in service on the part of the O.P. and violation of contract.
Issue is answered against the O.P.
Issue No.4 What relief the Complainant is entitled to get?
The Complainant is entitled for the relief as claimed for.
Accordingly, it is ordered:
ORDER
The Complaint is allowed on contest. The O.P. is directed to pay the maturity value of fixed deposit Rs. 13,861/- + Rs. 12,042/- total Rs. 25,873/- along with 7% interest P.A. w.e.f 28.06.2020 within one month of this order to the Complainant, failing which the amount will carry 12% P.A. till realisation.
Further the O.P. is directed to pay compensation of Rs. 20,000/- to-wards harassment and mental agony. In case of non-payment within one month the amount will also carry 12% interest P.A. till realisation.
Order pronounced on this 22nd day of August 2022.
Supply free copies to the parties.
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.