West Bengal

Purba Midnapur

CC/13/2015

Bibhutibhusan Das,S.O. Late Bankimchandra Das - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager of United India Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Udaysankar Mahapatra

08 Jul 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PURBA MEDINIPUR
ABASBARI, P.O. TAMLUK, DIST. PURBA MEDINIPUR,PIN. 721636
TELEFAX. 03228270317
 
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2015
 
1. Bibhutibhusan Das,S.O. Late Bankimchandra Das
Village- Sanbalisai, P.O. Hirapur, P.S. Ramnagar
Purba Medinipur
West Bengal
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager of United India Insurance Company Limited
Contai Branch, LDB Building, 2nd Floor, N.S. Road,P.O. Contai
Purba Medinipur
West Bengal
2. The Regional Manager of United India Insurance Company Limited
Himalaya House (2nd and 3rd Floor), 38 B, JL Nehru Road
Kolkata
West Bengal
3. The Registered & Head office of United India Insurance Company Limited
United India House, 24 Whited Road, Chennai-600014
Chennai
West Bengal
4. The Branch Manager of Contai Co-Operative Bank Ltd.(Ramnagar Branch)
P.O. Ramnagar, P.S. Ramnagar
Purba Medinipur
West Bengal
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Syeda Shahnur Ali,LLB PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Sri Santi Prosad Roy MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

The complainant is an owner of M/s. Bishwarupa Bastra Prathisthan at Post and P.S. Ramnagar, he had a cash credit loan account under Contai Co-Operative Bank Ltd. The O.P. No. 1, 2 & 3 insured the complainant by policy No. 031701/48/13/34/00000857 insured policy certified which was valid from 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2014. The complainant was insured with United India Insurance Company Ltd. The complainant shop was damaged by fire on 12/05/2014 at 5 a.m. The complainant lodged a G.D. before Ramnagar P.S. being G.D. No. 437 dated 12/05/2014 and informed the O.P. Insurer Company on 13/05/2014 by letter. The O.P. No 1,2 & 3 after making survey, sent a letter dated 12/09/2014 and agreed to pay 11,600/- as full and final settlement of the claim though the amount of loss was above Rs. 7,00,000/- due to fire. The complainant after accident made assessment by an auditor of the damaged for an amount of Rs. 90133/- the O.P. No.1, 2, & 3 taking a vague base less ground  OP repudiated the complainant claim the pecuniary damages. The Complainant stated that he is entitled to get compensation for the sum assured and also compensation for mental agony.  The Complainant did not agree to the amount of Rs. 11,600/-, hence the case.

The OP 1, 2 & 3 has entered appearance and contested the case. But, the case is heard Ex-parte against the OP no.4.The Op No.1, 2 & 3 filed their W.V. and also W.N.A. The O.P. admit that on early morning on 12/05/2014 the shop was damaged due to fire. They also admitted the matter was informed to local branch office on 13/05/2014. On getting information O.P. appointed Mr. P.K. Sen F.C.A. Surveyor and loss access to investigate the matter. The surveyor stated in his report that the complainant could not show any stock register nor any paper to ascertain the actual damage. He produced a loss assessment which was based on his memory, there are three list B-1, B-2 & B-3 given by complainant to surveyor. The surveyor and loss access made a calculation and also a report on 29/10/2014 in his survey report the surveyor has noted Fire policy of the insured property and was Rs.3,73,159/-. We have got in our complainant policy No. 031701/48/13/34/00000857 and the insurer being M/S. Bishwarupa Bastra Prathisthan from the shop keeper insurance schedule we find the some insured for damaged by fire was Rs. 373159/-. It is curious enough how the Surveyor had assessed the gross loss as Rs.26,750/- and net loss Rs.21,768/- and net amount payable to the complainant as Rs.11,668/-. We have gone through our documents filed by the party’s and find that the complainant had assured his loss to Rs. 7,78,755/- which was only his memory. From the ruling file by the O.P. CPJ –iv(203154) is self-explanatory on perusing the documents filed by the complainant we find that the loss assessed by the O.P. is arbitrary. Therefore, the complainant is entitled to get after deduction of 40%, Rs.2,23,896/-  together with interest @ Rs.9% p.a. from 15/05/2014 and also compensation Rs. 3,000/- for mental agony and Rs.2,000/- for litigation cost within 45 days from the date of the passing of the order. In case the OPs fail to comply the order, the complainant will be at liberty to execute the order as per law.

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Syeda Shahnur Ali,LLB]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri Santi Prosad Roy]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.