Orissa

Malkangiri

06/2014

Kartik Mondal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial services Ltd., - Opp.Party(s)

Sir Bijay Ku. Mahanty, Advocate,

19 Jan 2015

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. 06/2014
( Date of Filing : 20 Jan 2014 )
 
1. Kartik Mondal
aged about 30 years, S/o Toofan Mondal, Resident of Vill. M.V.46, Po:-Sikhgapalli, PS/Dist:-Malkangiri.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch Manager, Mahindra & Mahindra Financial services Ltd.,
Jeypore Dist-Koraput-764001 & Another
2. Sujit Maharana, Field Sales Consultant, Paramount Auto Mobiles Pvt. Ltd.,
Gandhi Chouck, Jeypore, PO. Jeypore, Dist. Koraput.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Ashok Kumar Pattnaik PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bhavani Acharya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 19 Jan 2015
Final Order / Judgement

 

           The case of the Complainant, in short is that he had purchased a Auto under higher purchase finance scheme being financed by the OP No-1 and total financed amount was 1,77,600/- including interest payable by 32 equal installments at the rate of Rs. 5550/- per month. It is further case of the complainant is that due to non registration, the complainant could not run the vehicle for which he failed to pay the installments and threatening for seize the vehicle. Finding no other alternative the complainant filed this case against the ops.

            The OP No-1 contested the case by way of filing his written version denying all allegations made against him.

             Despite notice the OP No-2 neither appeared nor filed his version hence he set ex-parte.

                                                                        Decision with reasons

            Heard the ld Advocate of both sides. Perused the pleadings with affidavits and also gone through the documents and record. It is admitted fact that the complainant has availed loan being financed by the OP-1 and it is the duty of the complainant to repay the finance amount as per the agreement.

            In course of hearing it is come to the light that despite our specific order dated 21.01.2014 passed in MC No. 1/2014, the complainant neither paid his installments nor made any correspondences with the Opposite Party No.1.

            So, no negligence and deficiency in service attributed against the Ops.

            Hence it is Ordered :

                                                                            ORDER

             The complainant case No. 06.2014 is devoid any merit, hence dismissed.

             Supply free copy to the parties as per rules.

            Delivered in open forum on this 19th January, 2015.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Ashok Kumar Pattnaik]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bhavani Acharya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.