Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.
This is a complaint filed U/s. 12 of C.p.Act, 1986 by one Pramila Dalbehera of Vill. Balijodi under Keonjhar District, who is at present residing at Angul in the house of one of her relative.
2. The case of the complainant is that her husband Prabhakar Dalbehera had obtained a policy from LIC of India through the agent (opp.party No.6 ) bearing policy No. 594774195 under New Endowment Plan and a certificate was issued in favour of her husband. The policy commenced from 28.07.2015 and the risk covered from 03.09.2015. On 18.12.2015 the complainant’s husband felt pain in his chest and died all of a sudden. The policy was in vogue when the husband of the complainant died. Being the wife and nominee of the deceased policy holder the complainant submitted her claim application before the opp.parties. On 01.04.2016 the opp.party No.2 supplied the claim forms for disbursement of the death claim. The complainant duly filled the claim form and submitted it along with all the required documents before the opp.parties. No steps was taken by the opp.parties for disbursement of the claim amount. At last finding no other way the complainant being a lady approached the agent but no result. On 12.03.2017 the complainant received a letter from opp.party No.3 ,in which she was asked to submit some documents. Again n 29.03.2017 she received another letter from opp.partyNo.5 , in which she was directed to attend East-Zonal office at Patna along with supporting documents. The complainant being a lady and rustic villager it was not possible on her part to travel Patna. On 30.06.2017 the complainant submitted her reply. Till filing of the case the opp.parties did not take any steps for payment of the dues to the complainant. Hence this complaint.
3. On 26.02.2016 one B.N.Samal the manager LIC of India, Divisional Office, Sambalpur has filed the written statement signed by him. The case of the opp.parties is that the case is not maintainable either in law or in part. There is no cause of action to file this case against the opp.parties. The case is barred for non-joinder of necessary parties and mis-joinder of unnecessary parties. This Forum/Commission has no territorial jurisdiction to decide the dispute raised by the complainant. It is a fact that a policy bearing No. 594774195 was issued in favour of Prabhakar Dalbehera by opp.party No.2, having commenced dt. 28.07.2015 for a sum assured of Rs. 5,00,000.00 with quarterly mode of payment. After receiving the information about the death by opp.party No.2, the complainant was asked for submission of claim form as per rules of the corporation. The complainant did not submit the forms in claim form B & B1 regarding the life assures treatment particulars. .The claim form of the complainant was forwarded to the concerned Divisional Office , as the death of Prabhakar Dalbehera was early in nature. The settlement of claim needs various inquiry and collection of documents which needs time. From internal inquiry by the opp.parties it is ascertained that Prabhakar Dalbehera was under going his treatment at S.C.B.Medical College,Cuttack for his heart disease but at the time of submission of proposal form he has suppressed the truth by not disclosing about his treatment. So the opp.parties repudiated the claim of the complainant.
4. From the complaint petition and the documents filed by the complainant it transpires that the policy holder Prabhakar Dalbehera was a permanent resident of Vill.Balijodi under Keojhar District. He had obtained the policy through agent (opp.party No.6) from branch office bearing Code No. 5004. From paragraph- 2 of the complaint petition it is clear that Prabhakar Dalbehera, the policy holder was running his footpath business at Redhakhol while he obtained the policy from the opp.parties. Prabhakar Dalbehera was a permanent resident of Keojhar District , who died in his native village Balijodi on 18.12.2015 . The complainant i.e wife of deceased Prabhakar Dalbehera has filed the photo copy of R.O.R which shows that Prabhakar Dalbehera has a gharbari land at Vill.Bantala under Angul Tahasil. All the transactions relating to the policy obtained by Prabhakar Dalbehera are outside the jurisdiction of this Forum/Commission. The complaint is filed under C.P.Act, 1986.
After going through Section-11 of the C.P.Act, 1986 it is clear that all the opp.parties are residing outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Forum/Commission except opp.party No.4. There is no reasons why the complainant has arrayed opp.party No.4 as a party to this case. He has no role to play in whole transaction in this case. The present residence of the complainant as claimed by her will not confer the territorial jurisdiction of the Forum/Commission. No part of the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of this forum/Commission. So after going through the materials placed by both the parties it is clear that this Forum/Commission has no territorial jurisdiction to decide the dispute raised by the complainant.
5. Hence order :-
: O R D E R :
The case be and the same is dismissed on contest on the ground that this Forum/Commission has no territorial jurisdiction to decide the dispute raised by the complainant.