DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOZHIKODE
PRESENT: Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN, M.Com, LLB : PRESIDENT
Smt. PRIYA.S, BAL, LLB, MBA (HRM) : MEMBER
Thursday, the 18th day of July 2024
CC.147/2022
Complainant
Akshay. S.A,
‘Karthika’ (HO),
Puthiyedath Thazhe Kuniyil,
Nanminda Post,
Kozhikode – 673 613.
Opposite Party
Branch Manager,
Kerala Gramin Bank,
Kakkur Brnch,
Kakkur Post,
Kozhikode – 673 613.
(By Adv. Sri. C. Radhakrishnan Nair)
ORDER
By Sri. P.C. PAULACHEN – PRESIDENT.
The complainant filed under section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 alleging deficiency of service on the part of the opposite party.
- The opposite party entered appearance and filed written version denying and disputing the allegations and claims made in the complaint.
- Today the case is posted for the affidavit of the complainant as last chance. But the complainant remained absent and there is no representation for him. The onus is on the complainant to prove the allegation of deficiency of service. But the complainant failed to let in any evidence to prove the case so as to get an order as prayed for. The complainant is continuously absent and it appears that he is not interested in pursuing the matter. No deficiency of service as alleged is proved against the opposite party.
In the result, the complaint is dismissed. No order as to costs.
Pronounced in open Commission on this, the 18th day of July, 2024.
Date of Filing: 23/06/2022.
Sd/- Sd/-
PRESIDENT MEMBER
APPENDIX
NIL
Sd/- Sd/-
PRESIDENT MEMBER
True Copy,
Sd/-
Assistant Registrar.
