Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.
This petition is filed by the complainant U/s. 35 of C.P.Act, 2019.
2. The case of the complainant is that he is a permanent resident of Vill. Kantimili, Sanamunda of Dhenkanl District. The opp.parties are running “Hamara India Credit Co-operative Society Ltd.,” known as “ Sahara Credit Co-operative Society Ltd,” for earning profit and got their branch office AT Angul town along with other places. The complainant being influenced by the opp.parties and their agent in the year 2018 i.e on 30.05.2018 opened four numbers of account bearing No. 12537401746,12537401749, 12537401750 & 12537401751, and deposited an amount of Rs. 20,800.00, Rs.4,000.00,Rs.4,400.00 & Rs.19,450.00 respectively .All those deposits were under fixed deposit scheme for a period 24 months which are to be matured on 30.05.2020. All the deposits were made by the complainant to earn his livelihood. Accordingly certificates No. 438000808192, 438000808193, 438000808194 & 438000808195 were issued in favour of the complainant by the office of the opp.parties. The complainant is entitled to Rs. 26,092.00,Rs.5,018.00, Rs.5,519 & Rs.24,398.00,in toto Rs. 61,027.00 from the opp.parties after maturity. Inspite of personal approach to opp.party No.1 and through telephone to other opp.parties they did not disburse the maturity amount along with other benefits to the complainant. On 10.11.2020 the complainant went to the office of opp.party No.1 with a written application with a prayer for disbursal of the maturity amount but the opp.party No.1 refused to receive the application and refused to pay the maturity amount. Hence this case for the maturity amount along with interest and compensation for deficiency in service , unfair trade practice ,litigation cost and other reliefs.
3. Notices were issued to all the opp.parties through Regd. Post with A.D on 16.01.2021. The A.Ds of all the opp.parties are available in the case record which shows service notice on them. Inspite of such notice to all the opp.parties through Regd. Post with A.D and receipts of the same they did not appear before this authority nor written statement was filed. Only on 12.10.2022 opp.party No.1 appeared through his advocate and challenged the maintainability of the present proceeding before this Commission. By order dtd. 28.12.2022 the petition filed by the Learned Counsel for the opp.party No.1 challenging the maintainability has been heard and disposed of. The point of maintainability of the present proceeding is to be decided along with other issues.
4. It is the specific plea of the opp.party No.1 that the complainant is a member of Sahara Co-operative Society Ltd , as such he is not a consumer as described under C.P.Act, 2019. He has relied on a decision of Hon’ble National Commission, New Delhi passed in Revision Petition No. 4871 of 2012 namely M/S. Anjana Abraham Chembethil Vrs. Managing Director, Koothattukulam Farmers Services Co-operative Bank .
On the other hand the learned counsel for the complainant relied on the following decisions :-
(i). Ram Kanwar Vrs. Sahara India Pariwar Pvt Ltd., of Hon’ble State Commission,U.T,Chhandigarh , passed on 28.09.2021.
(ii). The judgment passed on 21.07.2020 by Hon’ble National Commission,New Delhi in Revision Petition No. 4044 of 2014 in Branch Manager, Sahara India Vrs. Raj Kumari Devi .
(iii). The judgment passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 64/2010 ,65/2010,66/2010,67/2010 and 68/2010 in the case of Virendra Jain Vrs. Alaknanda Co-operative Group Housing Society Ltd. and others passed on 23.04.2013.
(iv). The judgment passed by Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Civil Appeal No. 92 of 1998 passed on 11.12.2003 in the case of The Secretary,Thirumurugan Co-operative Agricultural Credit Society Vrs. M.Lalitha (dead) through LRs. & Ors.
5. Perused the judgments relied on by both the parties. On perusal of the photo copies of certificates filed by the complainant it is clear that the complainant is a member of the co-operative society of the opp.parties business organization. It is also clear from the evidence on record that the complainant has deposited different amounts and certificates were issued in his favour by the society of the opp.parties. Even though he is a member of the society of the opp.parties he has invested certain amounts to earn the maturity amount on his deposits. From the judgment pronounced by the different Commissions and the Hon’ble Supreme Court relied on by the complainant it is crystal clear that the complaint is a consumer U/s. 2(7) of C.P.Act, 2019. So the plea of the opp.parties that the present complaint petition filed by the complainant is not maintainable is not acceptable at all .So the present complaint filed by the complainant is maintainable before this Commission.
6. From the complaint petition and the certificates issued by the opp.parties in favour of the complainant it is clear that the complainant has deposited different amounts with the society of the opp.parties on 03.05.2018 and are to be matured on 30.05.2020 .The certificate No. 438000808195 is to be matured on 30.05.2020 and the maturity amount is 24,398.00. The certificate No. 438000808194 having amount of Rs.4,400.00 is to be matured on 30.05.2020 with maturity amount of Rs. 30.05.2020.Certificate No. 438000808192 with deposit amount of Rs. 20,800.00 is to be matured on 30.05.2020 with maturity value of Rs.26,092.00 .Certificate No. 438000808193 with deposited amount of Rs. 4,000.00 is to be matured on 30.05.2020 with maturity value of Rs. 5,018.00 .It is also clear from the materials on record that inspite of several approach to the opp.parties they are not paying the maturated amount to the complainant after the date of maturity i.e on 30.05.2020. Even after getting notice in this case the opp.parties did not take any steps for payment of the matured amount. Hence the complainant is entitled to the matured amount along with interest @12% there on from the date of maturity. The deposits with the opp.parties are to be treated as a fixed deposit and the complainant is entitled to get interest on the matured amount since 30.05.2020 till payment is made.
7. Hence ordered :-
: O R D E R :
The case be and same is allowed in part on contest against the opp.party No.1 and exparte against the opp.party No.2 & 3. The opp.parties are jointly and severally liable for payment to the complainant. The opp.parties are directed to pay Rs. 61,027.00 along with interest @ 12 % p.a from the date of maturity until payment is made. The above opp.parties are also directed to pay an amount of Rs. 15,000.00 (Rupees Fifteen Thousand)only as compensation and Rs.5000.00 (Rupees Five Thousand) only towards litigation expenses. The opp.parties are further directed to comply the order within a period of one month of receipt of this order, failing which they are liable to pay penal interest @ 16% per annum, on the amount due by the complainant.