Haryana

Karnal

CC/393/2019

Ms Sunita - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Dharam Pal Raman

22 Jul 2019

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                                    Complaint No. 393 of 2019

                                                                     Date of instt. 05.07.2019

                                                                     Date of Decision 22.07.2019

 

Ms. Sunita widow of Om Parkash r/o village Nasirpur tehsil and District Karnal (Haryana).

                                                                                       …….Complainant

                                                Versus

 

1. Branch Manager, HDFC, ERGO, General Insurance Company Ltd. SCO no.237, IInd floor Sector 12, Karnal.

2. Manager, HDFC, ERGO, General Insurance Company Ltd. SCO no.124-125, 1^st floor sector 8-C, Madhya Marg, Chandigarh 160009.

3. Managing Director, HDFC, ERGO, General Insurance Company Ltd. 1^st floor, HDFC House, 165/166 Backbay Reclamation H.T. Parakh Marg Mumbai 400020.

4. Branch Manager, HDFC, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limit SCO no.247-248 1^st floor, Sector-12, Karnal.

5. Manager, HDFC, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limit SCO no.153-155 sector 8-C, Madhya Marg Chandigarh 160018.

6. Managing Director, HDFC, Housing Development Finance Corporation Limit Raman House H.T. Parakh Marg, 169 Backbay Reclamation H.T. Parakh Marg Charch Gate Mumbai 400020.

                                                                                      …..Opposite Parties.

 

           Complaint u/s 12 of the Consumer Protection Act.

 

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh……President.      

      Sh.Vineet Kaushik ………..Member

      Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……Member

              

 Present: Shri Surender Raman Advocate for complainant.

                 

                    Learned counsel of complainant made a statement for withdrawal of the complaint on account of technical defect, seeking permission to file afresh in competent court/forum.

                In view of statement of learned counsel of complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant would be at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:22.07.2019

                                                                                     President,

                                                                      District Consumer Disputes

                                                                      Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

 

                            (Vineet Kaushik)      (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary)  

                                    Member                   Member