Telangana

Mahbubnagar

CC/11/61

Makyala Venkataiah S/o Venkappa - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch Manager ,HDFC Bank Ltd.New Town, Mahabubnagar - Opp.Party(s)

Sri B. Ramnath Goud

11 Nov 2011

ORDER

                                    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT MAHABUBNAGAR

Friday, the 11^th day of November, 2011

                                                              Present:- Sri P. Sridhara Rao, B.Sc., LL.B., President

                                                                               Sri A. Veerupakshi, B.A., LL.B., Member

 Smt. D. Nirmala, B.Com., LL.B., Member

                                                                                C.C.No. 61 Of  2011

Between:

Makyala Venkataiah S/o Venkappa, aged 54 years, Occ: Agriculture,R/o 4-49A, Dudyal village, Bomraspet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.                                                                                                                        … Complainant

And

HDFC Bank Ltd., # 1-4-128 & 129, New Town, Mahabubnagar  through Branch Manager.                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               …Opposite Party

This is a complaint filed under section 12 of C.P. Act, 1986 praying to direct the opposite party not to put auction for sale of the Tractor AP22S-0574 and the Trailor No.AP22S-1218 and to receive third installment amount with penal charges and other installment as per the loan schedule with half yearly rests and to deliver the possession of the Tractor and Trailor in favour of the complainant and to pay Rs.20,000/- towards mental agony, financial stress and for deficiency of service and Rs.5,000/- towards costs to the complainant.  

 This C.C. coming on before us this day in the presence of  Sri B. Ramnath Goud, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the complainant and Sri K. Anil Kumar, Advocate, Mahabubnagar for the opposite party and the matter having stoodover for consideration till this day, this Forum delivered the following:  

                                                                                                            O R DE R

          At this stage, the complainant filed memo stating that the opposite party has returned the vehicle after receiving the due installments amount as such, he is not pressing this complaint. The memo is accordingly recorded. In view of the memo filed, the complaint is dismissed as not pressed.  No costs.    

   Pronounced by us in the open Forum, on this the 11^th day of November, 2011.

 

 

MEMBER                             MEMBER                               PRESIDENT