Kerala

Malappuram

CC/283/2023

SHAKIRULLAHI OP - Complainant(s)

Versus

BRANCH MANAGER COUNTRY VACATIONS - Opp.Party(s)

30 Nov 2023

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL
MALAPPURAM
 
Complaint Case No. CC/283/2023
( Date of Filing : 05 Jun 2023 )
 
1. SHAKIRULLAHI OP
PUTHANCHIRAKKAL HOUSE POOKALATHUR PULPETTA POST 676123
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. BRANCH MANAGER COUNTRY VACATIONS
1ST FLOOR BMT TRADE CENTRE MAIN BYPASS ROAD PUTHIYARA JUNCTION CALICUT 673004
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Nov 2023
Final Order / Judgement

By Sri. MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V, MEMBER

The grievance of the complainant is as follows:-

1.       The  complainant  has averred that the opposite party had  offered to make use of  holiday facility of the  opposite party  as  the complainant had selected for the same because   he  was a winner in the lucky  draw conducted  by  a shopping centre in Thiruvananthapuram.  On 24/07/2022 the complainant  reached  at the  office of the opposite party,  the  opposite party  had persuaded and instigated  for taking   a membership  in Country Club Hospitality and Holidays of the opposite party.  It is averred that the opposite party had made offer to use Hotels, Fitness centres and other Activity Spaces by availing membership.  As a result, the complainant  had availed  membership  by making  payment  of Rs. 60,350/-(Rupees Sixty thousand  three hundred and fifty only) and Rs. 36,349/- (Rupees Thirty six thousand  three hundred and  fourty nine only) to the  account of the opposite party  through  debit card transfer. On 30/07/2022 the complainant made another payment of Rs. 55,350/- (Rupees Fifty five thousand three hundred and fifty only) to the opposite party as last instalment by way of debit card transfer.  It is averred by the complainant that when he reached along with his family at Thiruvananthapuram, he could not avail facilities of the opposite party by using mobile App and same was informed to the opposite party. But same defects continued when the complainant had tried to avail facilities through a telephone number provided by the opposite party. So the complainant  went  to the office of the opposite party  and attempted  through  a  mobile  number of the Manager of the  opposite party  to avail  facility offered under  the Membership of the opposite party.   But all the efforts became futile and the complainant could not make use of the facilities offered.  It is averred by the complainant that he had contacted the head office of the opposite party and relinquished the membership of the opposite party.  So it is informed that the opposite party   has proceeded to get refund of the fee paid by the complainant.   When the complainant approached the opposite party to get back the amount, it was revealed by the opposite party that two instalments paid through debit card EMI will be refunded through bank on request and another instalment will be refunded by the Company directly.  So the complainant frequently visited  the bank  for refund  of the amount, but all efforts went in vain  as it was  informed  by the bank that the amount would be  given to the opposite party  not to the complainant.  Later the opposite party was directed to send email to the head office, resulting refund of Rs. 70,000/- to the complainant.  It is averred by the complainant that the opposite party is liable to refund balance of Rs. 82,049/- (Rupees Eighty two thousand and fourty nine only) to the complainant.  It is averred   that talks  were conducted  with the opposite party  for many times and the opposite party even  attempted  to execute  a document  stating full amount  was  refunded, without making actual payment.  It is alleged by the complainant that the opposite party has committed deficiency in service towards the complainant.  The act of the opposite party caused sufferings mental agony and hardship to the complainant.  So the complainant prayed for a direction to the opposite party to refund Rs. 82,049/- to the complainant as the balance of membership fee. The complainant was also prayed for a direction to the opposite party to pay Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One lakh  only) as compensation  and cost of the proceedings.

2.     The complaint is admitted on file and issued notice to the opposite party.  The opposite party received notice on 26/06/2023, but did not appear before the Commission.  The opposite party did not file version also.  So the Commission set the opposite party as  exparte.

3.      The complainant filed affidavit.  The documents produced by the complainant are marked as Ext. A1 to Ext. A4 documents.  Ext. A1 document is the copy of One Week Family Holiday Membership Card dated 24/07/2022 issued by the opposite party in favour of the complainant.  Ext. A2 document is the copy of Membership Agreement dated 24/07/2022 executed between the complainant and the opposite party. Ext.A3 series documents are the copies of payment receipts dated 30/07/2022 issued by the opposite party in favour of the complainant.  Ext. A4 document is the copy of Membership Certificate issued by the opposite party in favour of the complainant.

4.       Heard the complainant   in detail.  Gone through documents and affidavit of the complainant thoroughly. The Commission considered following points for adjudication of the matter:-

  1.  Whether the act of the opposite party constitute commission of deficiency in service.
  2.  Relief and cost.

5. Point No. (i) and (ii):-

        It is alleged by the complainant that, he had subscribed a Membership of the opposite party and Membership card is produced and marked as Ext. A1 document.  It is averred that the opposite party is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and it provides to its members facilities of holidays, Club memberships and fitness centres.  It is further averred that the complainant has subscribed the membership due to the persuasion and instigation made by the opposite party and remitted entire fees in three instalments.  The complainant produced Ext. A3 series documents to show the payment made by complainant to avail membership of the opposite party.  Ext.A3 series documents reveal that the complainant had remitted a total of Rs. 1,52,049/- to the opposite party for availing  membership.  The complainant also executed an agreement with the opposite party and it is produced and marked as Ext.A2 document.  Ext. A2 document would reveal that the opposite party is liable to provide facilities shown as Membership benefits. Ext.A4 document is the Membership Certificate issued by the opposite party to the complainant.

6.     The grievance of the complainant is that the opposite party had denied the facilities offered as per Ext. A2 document without any reason.  So the opposite party has committed deficiency in service towards the complainant.  It is averred that when the complainant and his family reached at Thiruvanthapuram, he attempted to avail facilities offered by the opposite party.  But the complainant could make use of the facility due to failure of the system operated by the opposite party.  So the complainant had cancelled the member and requested to refund the amount paid for membership.  It is averred that the opposite party had refunded Rs. 70,000/- only after making tedious efforts from the side of the complainant.  The opposite party did not repaid the balance amount of Rs. 82,049/- to the complainant.

7.    In the evaluation of evidence, it can be seen that the opposite party failed to provide the facilities offered under Ext.A2 document. So there is denial of service from the side of the opposite party. It is also  come out  in  evidence  that the opposite party  is  bound  to refund  the balance  of Rs. 82,049/- to the  complainant.  The Commission find that the opposite party has committed deficiency in service towards the complainant.  It is also find that the act of the opposite party has caused sufferings of mental agony and hardship to the complainant for which the opposite party is liable to compensate adequately.  There is no contra evidence available in this case to defend the pleadings of the complainant.  So the Commission find that the complainant has proved his case against the opposite party.  Hence complaint is allowed in the following manner:-

  1. The opposite party is directed to refund Rs. 82,049/- (Rupees Eighty two thousand and fourty nine only) to the complainant as the balance amount of the membership subscription fees.
  2. The opposite party is directed to pay Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) as compensation for the sufferings of mental agony and hardship due to the act of deficiency in service.
  3. The opposite party is directed to pay Rs. 5000/- (Rupees Five thousand only) to the complainant as the cost of the proceedings.

      The opposite party   shall comply  this order within  30 days  from the date of this order  otherwise  entire amount shall carry  9% interest per annum  from the date of the order till realization.

Dated this 30th  day of November, 2023.

 

 

MOHANDASAN K., PRESIDENT

 

PREETHI SIVARAMAN C., MEMBER

 

MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V., MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX

 

Witness examined on the side of the complainant                           : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the complainant                         : Ext.A1to A4

Ext. A1 : Document is the copy of One Week Family Holiday Membership card dated

                24/07/2022 issued by the opposite party in favour of the complainant. 

Ext. A2: Document is the copy of Membership Agreement dated 24/07/2022

               executed between the complainant and the opposite party. 

Ext. A3 : Series documents are the copies of payment receipts dated 30/07/2022

                 issued by the opposite party in favour of the complainant. 

Ext. A4 : Document is the copy of Membership Certificate issued by the opposite

                  party in favour of the complainant.

Witness examined on the side of the opposite party                      : Nil

Documents marked on the side of the opposite party                    : Nil

MOHANDASAN K., PRESIDENT

 

PREETHI SIVARAMAN C., MEMBER

 

MOHAMED ISMAYIL C.V., MEMBER

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHANDASAN K]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. MOHAMED ISMAYIL CV]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PREETHI SIVARAMAN C]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.