Orissa

Anugul

CC/10/2018

Ranjit Kumar Mahapatra - Complainant(s)

Versus

Branch manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Md. Azad

27 Apr 2023

ORDER

OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
ANGUL
 
Complaint Case No. CC/10/2018
( Date of Filing : 25 Jan 2018 )
 
1. Ranjit Kumar Mahapatra
At- Arasahi, Ward No-7, P.O/P.S-Talcher, Dist-Angul-759101
ANGUL
Odisha
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Branch manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd.
At- Sobhra Tower,Angul Town, NH-55, P.O/P.S/Dist.-Angul-759122
ANGUL
Odisha
2. Regional Officer-cum- Claim Manager, Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co. Ltd.
At- II floor,45/46,Hotel Basera, Ashok Nagar,Janapth,Bhubaneswar-751009,Odisha
Khurda
Odisha
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 27 Apr 2023
Final Order / Judgement

Sri S.K.Sahoo,President.        

              The  complainant  has  filed the  present petition U/s. 12 of  C.P.Act,1986.

2.        The  case of the  complainant  is that he is  the registered  owner of the  vehicle bearing Registration No. OD35B 4486  which  was purchased by  availing  finance  from  a private  company. The  vehicle  has  been purchased for  earning  his  livelihood. Annexure- 1   is the  photo copy   of the  certificate of registration. The  petitioner has insured the  vehicle  under the opp.parties which was  covered the  risk of accident and damage. The  number of  the  insurance  policy is  3379/01541358/000/00  which was  valid  from  05.10.2016  to mid night  of 04.10.2017. Annexure- 2   is the   photo copy of the  said insurance  policy. One  Surendra Bej   was  employed  as  driver , who had D.L No. –OD 1920130206057. Annexure- 3  is the  photo  copy  of the  said DL  of  Surendra Bej. When the  insurance  policy was in force and the  vehicle was  proceeding  towards JINDAL plant  on 30.08.2017  it met with  an  accident. After  getting   information about  such accident the  complainant  immediately informed  the  matter at  Mahavir Road  Out  Post Police Station who made  Station Diary Entry No.469 dtd.30.08.2017. Annexure- 4   is  the photo copy  of the  said  Station Diary Entry. After  receiving  information from the  complainant, the  opp.parties deputed  the  surveyor  Ashok Behera, who reached  at the  spot, verified  the  vehicle, took some  photographs, received all the relevant original documents from the  complainant   and  advised him  to remove  the vehicle from the  spot  for  necessary repairing   to make it  road worthy. With the  help of  crane  the  complainant  removed  the  accident vehicle from  the  spot  to  a garage  situated  at Talcher as  per the advice  of the  surveyor. After complete  dismantle  of the    damaged  vehicle  in  the   garage, the  complainant reported the  fact to the opp.parties  who sent the  surveyor  to the garage. The  surveyor duly  appointed  by the opp.parties  reached the garage, verified the vehicle, took some  photographs and received the  photo copy of the   original, supplementary  estimate and  advised  him  to   proceed with the repairing  work. The surveyor  did  not  supply the  copy of the  survey report  to the  complainant. The  estimated repairing  cost  of the  vehicle is Rs.3,50,000.00   which was  placed  before the  opp.parties. The  claim manager  assured the complainant  to release    the total  damaged  claim very soon. Annexure-5  is the   photo copy  of the  repairing   estimate. Inspite of  repeated approach  the opp.parties did not settle  the  claim. However, after receipt of the cost of the repairing  from the complainant, the opp.parties  immediately took  the  signature of the  complainant  on their  blank  claim forms  and   papers  including  discharge  voucher on the  revenue  ticket fixed  with   a purpose  to  disburse the  total  claim. As  the  said  claim   was not  settled by the  opp.parties the  complainant   repaired  the  accident  vehicle  by arranging  funds  from his  friends  and relatives. In the  month of  November,2017  without  any notice and  information   to the  complainant  the  opp.parties have disbursed  an amount of Rs.1,22,000.00 in favour  of the  finance company  without  following the  due  procedure  of  law. They have  not   released  that  amount  in favour of the   complainant, which amounts  to  deficiency  in service  and   adoption  of  unfair  trade  practice  by the opp.parties. Hence this  case.

3.         In  pursuance  of  notice, the  authorised  signatory  of  Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Company Ltd., filed  its  written  statement on 28.08.2018  and  copy was served on the complainant on the same day.

           The  case of the opp.parties is that there  is  no cause  of action   to file  this  case. The  case  is  not  maintainable   in the  eye  of law. The  complainant  is  not  a  consumer at all. There  is  no cause of  action to  file this case. The  complainant  knowing the  conditions of the  policy, paid the  premium and  obtained the  policy. The  financer  is the real owner  of the  vehicle and  unless  a No Objection Certificate  is  received from the  finance the   complainant  cannot  sale the  vehicle. So  according  to the  rules the  claim amount  was   actual  due  for the  accident  has  been paid  to the  financer. The  surveyor  is  an   independent   person and  obtained  licence  from IRDA. He  is  a  technical  person having  good  experience   to  assess the  loss and  damage   of the  vehicle. The  damage  claim  has  been paid to the  financer after   considering the  surveyor’s  report. So  the  allegations  made  against the  surveyor  are  false. The  amount   of Rs.1,22,229.00 is based  on the  surveyor’s report. The  case  be  dismissed.

4.        Admittedly the complainant has  purchased  a vehicle  bearing R.C No. OD 35B 4486 by availing  a  private  finance  to  earn  his  livelihood. Annexure-1   is the   photo copy  of the  registration certificate  of the  vehicle. It is  also admitted that  it  was  insured  with the opp.parties bearing  policy No. 3379/01541358/000/00  valid  from 05.10.2016 to  mid night  of  04.10.2017. Annexure-2   is the   photo copy  of the  said insurance certificate. It is  also  admitted that while the  said  vehicle  was drove by one Surendra Bej, who  had  got  valid driving  licence, it met with  an accident on 30.08.2017. The  fact of  such accident was   entered into  SDE No.469/2017  dtd. 30.08.2017  by  Mahabir Road Out  post. It is  also  admitted  that  after  survey the  surveyor  submitted his  report .The  complainant claimed an amount of Rs. 3,50,000.00  towards repairing  of the vehicle. He has  submitted the photo copy of the  Invoice issued  by different   persons towards repairing of the  vehicle.

           On the  other hand  it is stated  by the opp.parties  that  according   to the  assessment   by the  surveyor  an amount of Rs. 1,22,000.00  was paid  to the  financer who is the  actual owner of the  vehicle.  The said amount is as per the surveyor report. It is  admitted by the  complainant  that   he has  availed  finance   but  did not  disclosed the  name of the  financer. The  opp.parties  have  already  paid  the  amount  i.e Rs.1,22,000.00  to the  financer  in whose  favour  the  vehicle was  hypothecated.  No illegality has  been committed  by the  opp.parties  by  paying   the  amount  due  for  repairing of the  vehicle. There is no deficiency in service by the opp.parties.

5.         Hence  order :-

: O R D E R :

           The case  be and the  same  is  dismissed on contest.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Saroj Kumar Sahoo]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MS. Sasmita Kumari Rath]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.