NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/2166/2010

EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DIVISION & ORS. - Complainant(s)

Versus

BRAHM BALA SHARMA - Opp.Party(s)

MR GIRJESH PANDEY

14 Jun 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 2166 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 30/03/2010 in Appeal No. 526/2006 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)
1. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER ELECTRICITY DIVISION & ORS.Chatmani Electricity Office, Chatmani Bhawan, U.P. Power Corporation LimitedVaranasiUttar Pradesh2. S.D.O. U.P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDGodaulia Electricity Distribution Region Chatmani BhawanVaranasiUttar Pradesh3. PRESIDENT, U.P. POWER CORPORATION LIMITEDShakti BhawanLucknowUttar Pradesh4. EXECUTIVE ENGINEERBhelupurVaranasiUttar Pradesh ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. BRAHM BALA SHARMAResident of D-38/24, Hodgee KataraVaranasiUttar Pradesh ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. BATTA ,PRESIDING MEMBER
For the Petitioner :NEMO
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 14 Jun 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. There is concurrent findings of fora below directing electric connection to be given to the complainant as also compensation of Rs.10,000/-. I do not find any reason to interfere with the said findings in exercise of revisional jurisdiction under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as I do not find any illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error. The revision is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.


......................JR.K. BATTAPRESIDING MEMBER