Haryana

StateCommission

EA/74/2019

PREETI AGGARWAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

BPTP LIMITED - Opp.Party(s)

25 Feb 2022

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Execution Application No. EA/74/2019
( Date of Filing : 25 Mar 2019 )
In
Complaint Case No. CC/36/2016
 
1. PREETI AGGARWAL
HARYANA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. BPTP LIMITED
HARYANA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  A S Narang, PRESIDING MEMBER
  Suresh Chander Kaushik MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 25 Feb 2022
Final Order / Judgement

 

 

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

HARYANA PANCHKULA

 

 

                                                Execution Application No.74 of 2019 in

                                              Consumer Complaint No.36 of  2016

                                          Date of the Institution: 13.09.2019

                                  Date of Decision: 25.02.2022

 

 

Ms. Preeti Aggarwal R/o House No.865, Ward No.10, Sector-17, Faridabad.

                                      .….Decree Holders-Complainant

Versus

BPTP Limited, M-11, Middle Circle, Connought Circus, New Delhi, Delhi. 110001.

                                      .….Judgment Debtor-Opposite party

CORAM:    Mr.A S Narang, Judicial Member.

                   Mr. Suresh Chander Kaushik, Member.

 

 

Present:-    Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, counsel for the applicant/Decree Holder-complainant.          

Mr. Hemant Saini, counsel for the Judgment Debtor-opposite party

                  

                                                O R D E R

 

A.S. NARANG, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

 

 

(The matter has been heard through virtual hearing).

2.                Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant states that he has got the copy of the order passed by the Hon’ble National Consumer Commission, New Delhi from Mr. Hemant Saini, counsel for the Judgment Debtor-opposite party.            

3.                Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant also made a statement at the Bar that he will file a fresh execution application. He also states that he does not want to pursue the present execution application and wants to withdraw the same with the liberty to file a fresh one. He would file it again after the decision of the Hon’ble National Consumer Commission, New Delhi in Appeal No.697 of 2021 and Appeal No.698 of 2021.

4                 On the other hand, Mr. Hemant Saini, counsel for the Judgment Debtor-opposite party has no objection to the same.

5.                In view of the statement made by Mr. Tanmoy Gupta, counsel for the Decree Holder-complainant, the present the execution application is hereby dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file a fresh one. File be consigned to the record room.

 

 


 

February 25th, 2022                   Suresh Chander Kaushik                        A S Narang                                                        Member                                              Judicial Member

                                                    Addl. Bench                                               Addl. Bench  

                                                                       

J.Y.

 
 
[ A S Narang,]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
 
[ Suresh Chander Kaushik]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.