Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

125/2004

augstin matakins - Complainant(s)

Versus

bombay cycle and motors - Opp.Party(s)

Uday B. Wavikar

15 Mar 2011

ORDER

Complaint Case No. 125/2004   1. augstin matakins by constituted attorney mumbai taxi assiciation mumbai Mumbai Maharashtra ...........Complainant(s) Versus 1. bombay cycle and motors mumbai Mumbai Maharashtra ............Opp.Party(s)

BEFORE:     SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT   Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER

PRESENT:

ORDER               Today this matter is taken on board on the basis of an application made by Ld.Adv.Shri. S. Surana for Opposite Party No.2. Complainant Mr.Augustian Leo Matakias & his Constituted Attorney Mr.Kalikaprasad are also present. Mr.Samant, Manager of Opposite Party No.2 is also present. Complainant and Opposite Party No.2 have amicably settled the matter as stated in the consent terms. As matter is amicably settled, Complainant does not want to proceed with the complaint. Hence, complaint is disposed of as settled in terms of consent terms. No order as to cost.

[ SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE] PRESIDENT   [ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE] MEMBER