Maharashtra

DCF, South Mumbai

126/2004

suresh dskarkar - Complainant(s)

Versus

bombay cycle and motors Agency Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Uday B. Wavikar

15 Mar 2011

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. 126/2004
 
1. suresh dskarkar
Mumbai taxi assosiation,pathare bhuvan,kennedy bridge,opera house mumbai
Mumbai-4
Maharashtra
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. bombay cycle and motors Agency Ltd.
534,S.V. Patel rd,opera house mumbai
Mumbai-7
Maharashtra
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE PRESIDENT
  Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

              The Ld.Advocate for the Opposite Party No.2 Shri.S.Surana is present. The Complainant Mrs.Sharda S. Kesarkar alongwith her Constituted Attorney is also present. Mr.Samant, the Manager for Opposite Party No.2 is also present. Opposite Party No.1 is absent. Complainant and Opposite Party No.2 have settled the matter amicably in terms of consent terms. As the matter is settled amicably, Complainant does not want to proceed with the complaint. Hence, complaint is disposed of as settled in terms of consent terms. No order as to cost.

 
 
[ SHRI.S.B.DHUMAL. HONORABLE]
PRESIDENT
 
[ Shri S.S. Patil , HONORABLE]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.