Haryana

Ambala

CC/134/2020

Aseem Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

BM ICICI Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Ms. Sanjana

21 Feb 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no. :     134 of 2020.

                                                          `Date of Institution           :      06.07.2020.

                                                          Date of decision     :      21.02.2023.

 

Aseem Sharma son of Someshwar Nath Sharma aged about 39 years, r/o House No.111 Ram Nagar Ambala at Present House No.645-P, Sector-8 HUDA Ambala City.

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

1.  The Branch Manager, ICICI Bank Credit Card office At ICICI Bank Near Aggarsein Chowk, Ambala City.

2.  The Zonal Manager, ICICI Bank Credit Card Showroom No.6 Sector 6 Panchkula 134109.

3.  The General Manager, ICICI Bank Credit Card registered Tower Cwin, Autumn Estate, Near Chandivili Studio, Chandivali Farm Road, Mhada Colony, Chandivali Andheri East Mumbai 4000072

 

 

                                                                                       ….…. Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member.

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member             

                            

Present:        None for the complainant.

                   Shri Anil Kaushik, Advocate, counsel for the OPs.  

 

          Complaint under Section 12 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to cost of Rs.800/-, to be deposited, in the legal aid account, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even on the last date of hearing i.e. 03.02.2023, none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 21.02.2023.

 

 

 

Member                         Member                                 President

                                                                                DCDRC, Ambala