Haryana

Ambala

CC/247/2020

Satish Kumar - Complainant(s)

Versus

BM HDFC Bank - Opp.Party(s)

Kiran Pal Chaudhary

30 Jan 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

                                                          Complaint case no.          :      247 of 2020.

                                                          Date of Institution          :      23.10.2020.

                                                          Date of decision     :               30.01.2024.

 

 

Satish Kumar son of Shri Jai Singh, resident of Village Korwa, Tehsil Naraingarh, District Ambala.

 

                                                                                ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

     1.       Branch Manager, HDFC Bank, Branch Ambala Cantt.

     2.       Nodal Officer, HDFC Bank Limited, House Industrial Areas, Chandigarh.

     3.       HDFC ERGO Insurance Company, SCO No.237, IInd Floor, Sector-12, Karnal.

 

                                                                                                                                         ….…. Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member            

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

                   Shri Puneet Sirpaul, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.1 & 2.

                   Shri Mohinder Bindal, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.3.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.800/-, in the legal aid account, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that several opportunities have been taken by the complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. Case called several times since morning, but neither the complainant nor anybody else on his behalf has appeared before this Commission to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. Even on the last date of hearing i.e. 05.01.2024, none appeared on behalf of the complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 30.01.2024.

 

                                        Member                                                                         President

                                                          DCDRC, Ambala