Kerala

Thiruvananthapuram

CC/143/2021

Sira kumari - Complainant(s)

Versus

Blue star - Opp.Party(s)

23 May 2022

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
SISUVIHAR LANE
VAZHUTHACAUD
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
695010
 
Complaint Case No. CC/143/2021
( Date of Filing : 27 Mar 2021 )
 
1. Sira kumari
tvpm
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Blue star
tvpm
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 23 May 2022
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACADU THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

PRESENT

   SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN           : PRESIDENT

 SMT.PREETHA.G.NAIR         : MEMBER

 SRI.VIJU.V.R                        : MEMBER

 

CC.NO.143/2021 (Filed on : 27.03.2021 )

ORDER DATED : 23.05.2022

COMPLAINANT

Sivakumari.R

Aalila Bhavan,

Thriveni Garden,

Pathirapalli, Kudappanakkunu.P.O

 

(Party in person)

                                                VS

OPPOSITE PARTY

The Managing Director,

Bajaj Finance, Blue Star Arcade,

1888, (2, Manjalikulam)

Road near Railway Station,

Thampanoor, Thiruvananthapuram

                                                          ORDER

SRI.P.V.JAYARAJAN          : PRESIDENT

              1.     This complaint is filed under section 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019 and stood over to this date for consideration and this Commission passed the following order.

 

2.       This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite party alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite party. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite party from this Commission. The opposite party entered appearance and filed version denying the allegation of deficiency in service raised by the complainant.

 

 3.      When the case came up for consideration today, the complainant was present and submitted that the dispute between the complainant and opposite party was settled out of court and filed a memo stating that the complainant is not further willing to proceed with this complaint. The memo of settlement filed by the complainant is accepted and recorded. In view of the settlement arrived at between the parties to the dispute, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed as settled.

In the result, the complaint is dismissed. There will be no order as to costs.

A copy of this order as per the statutory requirements be forwarded to the parties free of charge and thereafter the file be consigned to the record room.

        Dictated to the Confidential Assistant, transcribed by her, corrected by me and pronounced in the Open Commission, this the 23rd day of May 2022.

 

                                                                                                       Sd/-

P.V.JAYARAJAN    : PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                           Sd/-

        PREETHA G NAIR      : MEMBER

 

                                                                                            Sd/-

                          VIJU.V.R        : MEMBER

 

 

 

 

 

 

be/

 

 

 

 

 

BEFORE THE DISTRICT

CONSUMER DISPUTES

 REDRESSAL COMMISSION

VAZHUTHACADU

 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

 

CC.NO.143/2021

ORDER DATED : 23.05.2022

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri.P.V.JAYARAJAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Preetha .G .Nair]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Viju V.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.