None has come present on behalf of the Opposite Party nor publication letter for affecting the service of Opposite Party collected. Perusal of the record shows that on 16.09.2022, the complainant had filed an application U/o 5 Rule 20 for affecting the service for the opposite party by way of publication, which was allowed and the opposite parties were ordered to be served through publication and the complainant was directed to collect the publication letter and got affect the service of opposite parties through publication. Thereafter complainant was granted five opportunities with a direction to collect the publication letter and got affect the service of Opposite Parties, through publication, but despite that publication letter for affecting the service of Opposite Parties not collected. Perusal of the record further shows that from the last three hearings none has come present on behalf of the complainant. Today, again none has come present on behalf of the complainant nor publication letter for affecting the service of Opposite Parties collected. Hence, it is presumed that the complainant is not interested in prosecuting his case. As such, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Copies of this order be supplied to the parties free of costs and thereafter, the file be consigned to record room after compliance.

Announced in open Commission.