By P.K.Nayak,M.A.LL.B, Member

Facts of the case:

           The complainant filed this case against the O.P. on 04.06.2020 praying for a direction to the O.P to release the 1^st instalment alongwith others of the work order allotted in her name under PMAY scheme and for a compensation of Rs.1,00,000/- for her mental agony.

          The complainant had got a work order from the O.P.  for the year 2016-17 bearing No.2354 as a beneficiary under PMAY Scheme, against which she has submitted  documents as her evidence. She states that after getting this she had broken her existed house expecting to construct a Pucca house by the amounts to be provided, under the Government sponsored social welfare scheme (PMAY) meant for poor and needy. So now she has no house of her own to live in .As she could not constructed due to want of the 1^st installment amount though three year have already been passed. She has approached the O.P. in written as well as verbally to the O.P, B.D.O, Boudh, but could not avail any relief.

         On the other hand, the G.P. on behalf of the O.P has submitted that the complaint is not coming under purview of consumer Act, though he admitted the complainant as beneficiary under the Govt. sponsored social welfare scheme (PMAY). He denies the fact narrated in the petition. He objects the petition regarding making party to Govt. officials but not making state Government as O.P. So he submits for dismissal of the case as not maintainable before this Hon’ble Commission.

         Having considering the submission of both the parties and documentary evidence in the records, we are of the view that the complaint is not maintainable under the provision of C.P Act 1986.Hence, dismissed without cost and compensation .The case is disposed of.

       Order pronounced in open court. Seal and signature of the Commission this the 27^th day of February, 2023.

       The final order is signed and sealed and computerised as to my dictation. Copy be supplied free of cost, if applied for.