Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

2.      Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that learned District Commission, Jagatsinghpur has passed ex parte order without hearing the OPs and at the same time, passed ex parte interim order against the OPs   not to repossess the asset  (vehicle) bearing Registration No. OD-04Q-9239 and not to take any coercive action against the vehicle of the complainant. He further submits that the complainant is in arrear of some EMI dues. So, he submitted that the impugned order should be set aside and liberty be given to the OPs to hear on the interim application.

3.      Considered the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners and   perused the impugned order. There is no defect in exercising the jurisdiction by the learned District Commission. But when there is arrear amount pending against the complainant, the impugned order passed by the learned District Commission is defective by passing such order without any condition imposed on the complainant. Therefore, the revision petition is disposed of by revising the impugned order to the extent that the OPs shall not take any coercive action against the complainant and the vehicle subject to deposit of Rs.1,50,000/- by the complainant with the OPs within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order.

4.      The revision petition is disposed of accordingly.