NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/53/2010

HUDA - Complainant(s)

Versus

BHISHAM KUMAR - Opp.Party(s)

MR. R.S. BADHRAN

16 Mar 2010

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 53 OF 2010
(Against the Order dated 06/11/2009 in Appeal No. 362/2005 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. HUDAThrough its Estate Offier, Sector 12Faridabad ...........Petitioner(s)
Versus
1. BHISHAM KUMARResident of 55/13, Kashmir AvenueAmritsarPunjab ...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.C. JAIN ,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA ,MEMBER
For the Petitioner :MR. R.S. BADHRAN
For the Respondent :NEMO

Dated : 16 Mar 2010
ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

the learned counsel for the petitioner. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the considered opinion that the impugned order passed by the State Commission is eminently justified and suffers from no illegality, material irregularity or jurisdictional error which calls for our interference in revision jurisdiction u/s 21 (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. Accordingly, the revision petition is dismissed.



......................JR.C. JAINPRESIDING MEMBER
......................ANUPAM DASGUPTAMEMBER