NCDRC

NCDRC

RA/9/2014

INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY - Complainant(s)

Versus

BHAVNA & ANR. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ANIL K. SHARMA

17 Jan 2014

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 9 OF 2014
 
IN
RP/3175/2013
1. INDORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
...........Appellants(s)
Versus 
1. BHAVNA & ANR.
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.M. MALIK, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Appellant :
For the Respondent :

Dated : 17 Jan 2014
ORDER

DATED : 17.01.2014 (IN CHAMBER) O R D E R I have perused the review petitions. The said applications are not maintainable. Section 22(2) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, lays down that, without prejudice to the provisions contained in sub-section (1), this Commission shall have the power to review, when there is an error apparent on the face of record. There appears to be no error apparent on the face of the record. The petitioner has power to recover from the Society, as per aw. The Review Petitions are dismissed.

 
......................J
J.M. MALIK
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.