Haryana

Karnal

375/2012

Ram Phal S/o Aatma Ram - Complainant(s)

Versus

Bhatia Electricals., Bajaj Allianz Gernal Insurance CompanyLimited - Opp.Party(s)

Dinesh Sharma

10 Sep 2015

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

 

                                                          Complaint No.375 of 2012

                                                               Date of instt:07.08.2012

                                                               Date of decision: 06.10.2015

 

Ram Phal son of Shri Aatma Ram resident of village Ssergarh Tapu tehsil and District Karnal..

                                                   ……….Complainant.

                             Versus

 

1.Bhatia Electricals, Karnal through its partner Sh.Puneet Bhatia son of Sh.Chander Parkash Bhatia, resident of Old Housing colony, Karnal.

2.Bajaj Allianz  General Insurance company Limited SCO 226, Sector -12, Karnal through its Manager.

                                                           ……… Opposite parties.

 

                     Complaint U/s  12  of the Consumer

                     Protection Act.

 

Before          Sh.K.C.Sharma……. President.

                   Sh.Anil Sharma ………Member.

                   Smt.Shashi Sharma…..Member.   

         

 

 Present:       Sh.Dinesh Sharma Advocate for the complainant.

                   Sh.D.K.Sharma Advocate for the OP No.1.

                   Sh.Rohit Gupta Advocate for the OP no.2.

ORDER:

 

                        Sh.Rohit Gupta Advocate for OP No.2 made statement that compromised has been effected between complainant and OP No.2 and as per compromise, OP No.2 will make the payment of Rs.two lacs to the complainant as full and final settlement of the claim, within a period of sixty days. Thereafter, the learned counsel for the complainant made  statement for withdrawal of the complaint by stating that having regard to the statement made by the learned counsel for OP No.2, he does not want to pursue with  the present complaint. Statements of both the learned counsel for the parties have been recorded in separately.

 

3.               In view of the statement made by the learned counsel for the complainant, the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn having been  compromised. However, the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
dated:06.10.2015                                                                            

                                                                    (K.C.Sharma)

                                                                   President,

                                                         District Consumer Disputes

                                                          Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 (Anil Sharma)       (Smt.Shashi Sharma)    

   Member.                             Member.